Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33318828›Full record

ArticleNursing open2021

A cross-sectional study of early mobility practice in intensive care units in Sarawak Hospitals, Malaysia.

Siew Yieng Yong, Sidiah Siop, Wee Meng Kho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Siew Yieng YongAdvanced Diploma in Intensive Care Nursing Ministry of Health Malaysia Training Institution Kuching Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-5373-8899
Sidiah SiopNursing Department Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) Kuching Malaysia.
Wee Meng KhoInternal Medicine and Dermatology Timberland Medical Centre Kuching Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: To determine the prevalence, characteristics of EM activities, the relationship between level of activity and mode of ventilation and adherence rate of EM protocol. Background: Mobilizing ICU patients remains a challenge, despite its safety, feasibility and positive short-term outcomes. Design: A cross-sectional point prevalence study. Methods: All patients who were eligible and admitted to the adult ICUs during March 2018 were recruited. Data were analysed by using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 24 for Windows. Results: The prevalence of EM practice was 65.6%. The most frequently reported avoidable and unavoidable factors inhibit mobility were deep sedation and vasopressor infusion, respectively. Level II of activity was the most common level of activity performed in ICU patients. The invasive ventilated patient had 12.53 the odds to stay in bed as compared to non-invasive ventilated patient. An average adherence rate of EM protocol was 52.5%.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsRespiration, ArtificialAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHospitalsHumansMalaysiaadherenceearly mobilityprevalence

Identifiers

PMID33318828
PMCPMC7729545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.