Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33318807›Full record

SynthesisNursing open2021

Evaluating the effect of prenatal interventions on maternal-foetal attachment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Elieh Abasi, Afsaneh Keramat, Narjes Sadat Borghei, Shahrbanoo Goli, Maryam Farjamfar

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elieh AbasiStudent Research Committee School of Nursing and Midwifery Shahroud University of Medical Sciences Shahroud Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1726-6457
Afsaneh KeramatReproductive Studies and Women's Health Research Center Shahroud University of Medical Sciences Shahroud Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-8728-7790
Narjes Sadat BorgheiCounseling & Reproductive Health Research Center Midwifery Department Golestan University of Medical sciences Gorgan Iran.
Shahrbanoo GoliDepartment of Epidemiology Shahroud University of Medical Sciences Shahroud Iran.
Maryam FarjamfarClinical Research Development Unit Imam Hossein Hospital Shahroud University of Medical Sciences Shahroud Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of prenatal interventions on maternal foetal attachment. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: In this study, a comprehensive review was performed to find articles published from January 2000 - December 2019 in the form of randomized and non-randomized clinical trials. To this end, online databases including PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Proquest, Ovid, CINAHL and JAMA were searched. Duplicate articles were also excluded using Endnote X7 Reference. The results were then analysed via RevMan 5.3 software. Results: The results showed that foetal movement counting did not seem to be effective in increasing MFA by itself. But, this intervention alongside other attachment behaviours such as touching the belly and talking to foetus could enhance MFA. Therefore, the best interventions to improve MFA might be combined ones implemented in the form of counselling and training sessions.

Indexed as

PregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsFemaleHumansNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicPrenatal CareRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicattachmentinterventionmaternal–foetal attachmentmeta‐analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33318807
PMCPMC7729675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.