Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33318793›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020

Gender disparities in lung cancer survival from an enriched Florida population-based cancer registry.

Adel Elkbuli, Margaret M Byrne, Wei Zhao, Mason Sutherland, Mark McKenney, Yeissen Godinez, Devina J Dave, Layla Bouzoubaa, Tulay Koru-Sengul

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The evolving landscape of sex-based differences in lung cancer: a distinct disease in women.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adel ElkbuliDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120, NW 14Street, Don Soffer Clinical Research Center, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Margaret M ByrneDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120, NW 14Street, Don Soffer Clinical Research Center, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Wei ZhaoSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Mason SutherlandDepartment of Surgery, Kendall Regional Medical Center, 11750 SW 40th St, Miami, FL, 33175, USA.
Mark McKenneyDepartment of Surgery, Kendall Regional Medical Center, 11750 SW 40th St, Miami, FL, 33175, USA.
Yeissen GodinezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kendall Regional Medical Center, 11750 SW 40th St, Miami, FL, 33175, USA.
Devina J DaveDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120, NW 14Street, Don Soffer Clinical Research Center, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Layla BouzoubaaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120, NW 14Street, Don Soffer Clinical Research Center, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Tulay Koru-SengulDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120, NW 14Street, Don Soffer Clinical Research Center, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
University of Miami · USRegional Medical Center · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have revealed gender disparities in lung cancer survivorship, but comprehensive inclusion of clinical/individual variables which affect outcomes is underreported. We utilized the Florida Data Cancer System (FCDS) to examine associations between gender and lung cancer survivorship while controlling for prognostic variables on a large population-based scale.

methodsA retrospective cohort analysis utilizing the FCDS, linked to Florida Agency for Health Care Administration and US Census Bureau tracts for patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer (n = 165,465) from 1996 to 2007. Primary outcome measures included median survival time and mortality. Multivariable Cox regression models, independent sample T-tests, and descriptive statistics were utilized with significance defined as p < 0.05.

results165,465 cases were analyzed revealing 44.3% females and 55.7% males. The majority of patients were white/Caucasian, males, middle-high socioeconomic status, lived in urban areas, and geriatric age. Females had longer median survival compared to males (9.6 vs 7.1 months). Multivariable analyses showed that women had better survival after controlling for sociodemographic, clinical, and comorbidity covariates. Males had higher risk of mortality than females (aHR = 1.17, 95%CI 1.14-1.19,

conclusionsIndividuals of higher socioeconomic status experienced greater survivorship compared to those of lower socioeconomic status. Women experienced significantly better survival for lung cancer at multiple time frames after controlling for covariates compared to men. Interventions aimed at public education and access to high-quality healthcare are needed to ameliorate socioeconomic and gender-based disparities in lung cancer survivorship. Future studies should investigate gender differences in lung cancer while incorporating individual socioeconomic status and treatment received.

Indexed as

Gender disparityHealthcare accessHealth inequalitiesLung cancer survivalSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID33318793
PMCPMC7723764
OpenAlexW3110255158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.