Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33318692›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2021

Inducible mouse models of colon cancer for the analysis of sporadic and inflammation-driven tumor progression and lymph node metastasis.

Clemens Neufert, Christina Heichler, Thomas Brabletz, Kristina Scheibe, Verawan Boonsanay, Florian R Greten, Markus F Neurath

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. 5Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Bifidobacterium adolescentis induces DecorinJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Clemens Neufert *First Department of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. clemens.neufert@uk-erlangen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1418-7921
Christina Heichler *First Department of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Thomas BrabletzDepartment of Experimental Medicine 1, Nikolaus-Fiebiger-Center for Molecular Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Kristina ScheibeFirst Department of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1672-7234
Verawan BoonsanayInstitute for Tumor Biology and Experimental Therapy, Georg-Speyer-Haus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Florian R GretenDepartment of Experimental Medicine 1, Nikolaus-Fiebiger-Center for Molecular Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3928-6080
Markus F NeurathFirst Department of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEGeorg Speyer Haus · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in the detection and therapy of colorectal cancer (CRC) in recent years, CRC has remained a major challenge in clinical practice. Although alternative methods for modeling CRC have been developed, animal models of CRC remain helpful when analyzing molecular aspects of pathogenesis and are often used to perform preclinical in vivo studies of potential therapeutics. This protocol updates our protocol published in 2007, which provided an azoxymethane (AOM)-based setup for investigations into sporadic (Step 5A) and, when combined with dextran sodium sulfate (Step 5B), inflammation-associated tumor growth. This update also extends the applications beyond those of the original protocol by including an option in which AOM is serially applied to mice with p53 deficiency in the intestinal epithelium (Step 5C). In this model, the combination of p53 deficiency and AOM promotes tumor development, including growth of invasive cancers and lymph node metastasis. It also provides details on analysis of colorectal tumor growth and metastasis, including analysis of partial epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, cell isolation and co-culture studies, high-resolution mini-endoscopy, light-sheet fluorescence microscopy and micro-CT imaging in mice. The target audience for our protocol is researchers who plan in vivo studies to address mechanisms influencing sporadic or inflammation-driven tumor development, including the analysis of local invasiveness and lymph node metastasis. It is suitable for preclinical in vivo testing of novel drugs and other interventional strategies for clinical translation, plus the evaluation of emerging imaging devices/modalities. It can be completed within 24 weeks (using Step 5A/C) or 10 weeks (using Step 5B).

Indexed as

AnimalsAzoxymethaneColonic NeoplasmsDextran SulfateDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionFemaleInflammationLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLAzoxymethaneDextran Sulfate

Identifiers

PMID33318692
OpenAlexW3110799738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.