Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33318659›Full record

ArticleNature methods2021

Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation.

Carsen Stringer, Tim Wang, Michalis Michaelos, Marius Pachitariu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2,356 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2,356citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2,356 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis of Ewing Sarcoma.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2,296 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carsen StringerHHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA.
Tim WangHHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA.
Michalis MichaelosHHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA.
Marius PachitariuHHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA. pachitarium@janelia.hhmi.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7106-814X

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many biological applications require the segmentation of cell bodies, membranes and nuclei from microscopy images. Deep learning has enabled great progress on this problem, but current methods are specialized for images that have large training datasets. Here we introduce a generalist, deep learning-based segmentation method called Cellpose, which can precisely segment cells from a wide range of image types and does not require model retraining or parameter adjustments. Cellpose was trained on a new dataset of highly varied images of cells, containing over 70,000 segmented objects. We also demonstrate a three-dimensional (3D) extension of Cellpose that reuses the two-dimensional (2D) model and does not require 3D-labeled data. To support community contributions to the training data, we developed software for manual labeling and for curation of the automated results. Periodically retraining the model on the community-contributed data will ensure that Cellpose improves constantly.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerSoftwareAnimalsCell NucleusFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeurons

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.