Trial reportScientific reports2020
Logistic regression analysis of environmental and other variables and incidences of tuberculosis in respiratory patients.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Household air pollution exposure and risk of tuberculosis: a case-control study of women in Lilongwe, Malawi.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Heart Failure and PAHs, OHPAHs, and Trace Elements Levels in Human Serum: Results from a Preliminary Pilot Study in Greek Population and the Possible Impact of Air Pollution.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine the association of 14 variables with TB in respiratory patients. The variables included: urban/rural, persons in 1200 sqft area, TB in family, crowding, smoking (family member), gender, age, education, smoking, workplace, kitchen location, cooking fuel, ventilation, and kerosene uses. Eight hundred respiratory patients were tested for sputum positive pulmonary TB; 500 had TB and 300 did not. An analysis of the unadjusted odds ratio (UOR) and adjusted OR (AOR) was undertaken using logistic regression to link the probability of TB incidences with the variables. There was an inconsistency in the significance of variables using UOR and AOR. A subset model of 4 variables (kerosene uses, ventilation, workplace, and gender) based on significant AOR was adjudged acceptable for estimating the probability of TB incidences. Uses of kerosene (AOR 2.62 (1.95, 3.54)) consistently related to incidences of TB. It was estimated that 50% reduction in kerosene uses could reduce the probability of TB by 13.29% in respiratory patients. The major recommendation was to replace kerosene uses from households with a supply of clean fuel like liquid petroleum or natural gas and rural electrification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.