Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33318584›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2021

Massively parallel sequencing analysis of 68 gastric-type cervical adenocarcinomas reveals mutations in cell cycle-related genes and potentially targetable mutations.

Pier Selenica, Barbara Alemar, Cathleen Matrai, Karen L Talia, Emanuela Veras, Yaser Hussein, Esther Oliva, Regina G H Beets-Tan, Yoshiki Mikami, W Glenn McCluggage and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Response to Ismayilov and Altundag.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cervical HPV-independent adenosquamous carcinoma: report of a case series.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. HPV-Independent Cervical Cancer-A New Challenge of Modern Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Features of HPV-Independent Cervical Cancers.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Assessing the Genomic Landscape of Cervical Cancers: Clinical Opportunities and Therapeutic Targets.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Pier SelenicaDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Barbara AlemarDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Cathleen MatraiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Karen L TaliaDepartment of Pathology, Royal Women's Hospital and VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Emanuela VerasDepartment of Pathology, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yaser HusseinDepartment of Pathology, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, NJ, USA.
Esther OlivaDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Regina G H Beets-TanGROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Yoshiki MikamiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
W Glenn McCluggageDepartment of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Takako KiyokawaThe Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7407-6345
Britta WeigeltDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Kay J ParkDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8989-2938
Rajmohan MuraliDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. MuraliR@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6988-4295
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USBelfast Health and Social Care Trust · GBCornell University · USJikei University School of Medicine · JPKumamoto University Hospital · JPMaastricht University · NLMassachusetts General Hospital · USMorristown Medical Center · USRoyal Women's Hospital · AUSibley Memorial Hospital · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric-type cervical adenocarcinoma (GCA) is an aggressive type of endocervical adenocarcinoma characterized by mucinous morphology, gastric-type mucin, lack of association with human papillomavirus (HPV) and resistance to chemo/radiotherapy. We characterized the landscape of genetic alterations in a large cohort of GCAs, and compared it with that of usual-type HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinomas (UEAs), pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PAs) and intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinomas (IGAs). GCAs (n = 68) were subjected to massively parallel sequencing targeting 410-468 cancer-related genes. Somatic mutations and copy number alterations (CNAs) were determined using validated bioinformatics methods. Mutational data for UEAs (n = 21), PAs (n = 178), and IGAs (n = 148) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were obtained from cBioPortal. GCAs most frequently harbored somatic mutations in TP53 (41%), CDKN2A (18%), KRAS (18%), and STK11 (10%). Potentially targetable mutations were identified in ERBB3 (10%), ERBB2 (8%), and BRAF (4%). GCAs displayed low levels of CNAs with no recurrent amplifications or homozygous deletions. In contrast to UEAs, GCAs harbored more frequent mutations affecting cell cycle-related genes including TP53 (41% vs 5%, p < 0.01) and CDKN2A (18% vs 0%, p = 0.01), and fewer PIK3CA mutations (7% vs 33%, p = 0.01). TP53 mutations were less prevalent in GCAs compared to PAs (41% vs 56%, p < 0.05) and IGAs (41% vs 57%, p < 0.05). GCAs showed a higher frequency of STK11 mutations than PAs (10% vs 2%, p < 0.05) and IGAs (10% vs 1%, p < 0.05). GCAs harbored more frequent mutations in ERBB2 and ERBB3 (9% vs 1%, and 10% vs 0.5%, both p < 0.01) compared to PAs, and in CDKN2A (18% vs 1%, p < 0.05) and KRAS (18% vs 6%, p < 0.05) compared to IGAs. GCAs harbor recurrent somatic mutations in cell cycle-related genes and in potentially targetable genes, including ERBB2/3. Mutations in genes such as STK11 may be used as supportive evidence to help distinguish GCAs from other adenocarcinomas with similar morphology in metastatic sites.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaFemaleGenes, cdcHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationSequence Analysis, DNAUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33318584
PMCPMC8154628
OpenAlexW3112479683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.