Trial reportScientific reports2020
Low-motion fMRI data can be obtained in pediatric participants undergoing a 60-minute scan protocol.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of person-centred adjustments to facilitate magnetic resonance imaging for autistic patients without the use of sedation or anaesthesia.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2022Pooled it
- Practical considerations for dense longitudinal neuroimaging: Ten simple rules for frequent scanning over short time periods.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Feature overlap in transdiagnostic connectome-based models of sustained attention and autism symptoms.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Optimizing functional connectivity scanning conditions for predicting autistic traits.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Optimizing functional connectivity scanning conditions for predicting autistic traits.Nature. Mental health · 2026Article
- Social Connectedness and Neurodevelopmental Functioning in Youth: Insights from the ABCD StudyAdvances in neurodevelopmental disorders · 2025Article
- Differences in Head Motion During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Across Pediatric Neuropsychiatric Disorders.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2025Article
- How much is "enough"? Considerations for functional connectivity reliability in pediatric naturalistic fMRI.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Resting state functional brain connectivity in child and adolescent psychiatry: where are we now?Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Optimizing Care for Autistic Patients in Health Care Settings: A Scoping Review and Call to Action.Academic pediatrics · 2024Article
- Delineating a Pathway for the Discovery of Functional Connectome Biomarkers of Autism.Advances in neurobiology · 2024Review
- Enhancing precision in human neuroscience.eLife · 2023Review
- A generalizable connectome-based marker of in-scan sustained attention in neurodiverse youth.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Functional Connectome-Based Predictive Modeling in Autism.Biological psychiatry · 2022Review
- Accounting for motion in resting-state fMRI: What part of the spectrum are we characterizing in autism spectrum disorder?NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Predicting the future of neuroimaging predictive models in mental health.Molecular psychiatry · 2022Review
- A Descriptive Review of the Impact of Patient Motion in Early Childhood Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Getting the nod: Pediatric head motion in a transdiagnostic sample during movie- and resting-state fMRI.PloS one · 2022Article
- Predicting multiscan MRI outcomes in children with neurodevelopmental conditions following MRI simulator training.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2021Article
- Infant and Child MRI: A Review of Scanning Procedures.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Performing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans of children can be a difficult task, as participants tend to move while being scanned. Head motion represents a significant confound in fMRI connectivity analyses. One approach to limit motion has been to use shorter MRI protocols, though this reduces the reliability of results. Hence, there is a need to implement methods to achieve high-quality, low-motion data while not sacrificing data quantity. Here we show that by using a mock scan protocol prior to a scan, in conjunction with other in-scan steps (weighted blanket and incentive system), it is possible to achieve low-motion fMRI data in pediatric participants (age range: 7-17 years old) undergoing a 60 min MRI session. We also observe that motion is low during the MRI protocol in a separate replication group of participants, including some with autism spectrum disorder. Collectively, the results indicate it is possible to conduct long scan protocols in difficult-to-scan populations and still achieve high-quality data, thus potentially allowing more reliable fMRI findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.