Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33318501›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Dynamics of social network emergence explain network evolution.

Caleb Pomeroy, Robert M Bond, Peter J Mucha, Skyler J Cranmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Caleb PomeroyDepartment of Political Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Robert M BondSchool of Communication, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Peter J MuchaCarolina Center for Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, Department of Mathematics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Skyler J CranmerDepartment of Political Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. cranmer.12@osu.edu.

Funding

Development of a statistical framework for the analysis of social network predictors of therapeutic community outcomesR34DA043079 · NIDA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WARREN, KEITH LEVERETT · 2018 to 2020
$690k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA043079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Networked systems emerge and subsequently evolve. Although several models describe the process of network evolution, researchers know far less about the initial process of network emergence. Here, we report temporal survey results of a real-world social network starting from its point of inception. We find that individuals' ties undergo an initial cycle of rapid expansion and contraction. This process helps to explain the eventual interactions and working structure in the network (in this case, scientific collaboration). We propose a stylized concept and model of "churn" to describe the process of network emergence and stabilization. Our empirical and simulation results suggest that these network emergence dynamics may be instrumental for explaining network details, as well as behavioral outcomes at later time periods.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationSocial BehaviorSocial NetworkingHumans

Identifiers

PMID33318501
PMCPMC7736284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.