Trial reportScientific reports2020
Effectiveness of transfer learning for enhancing tumor classification with a convolutional neural network on frozen sections.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Breast Cancer Histopathology: Toward Improved Diagnosis and Prognosis.Cancers · 2026Review
- Deep-learning-based breast cancer stage prediction from H&E-stained whole-slide images in resource-constrained settings.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Efficient Biological Decolorization of Malachite Green by Deinococcus wulumuqiensis R12: Process Optimization and Degradation Pathway Analysis.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Transparency and Representation in Clinical Research Utilizing Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: A Scoping Review.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- E-DFu-Net: An efficient deep convolutional neural network models for Diabetic Foot Ulcer classification.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Article
- AI-augmented pathology: the experience of transfer learning and intra-domain data diversity in breast cancer metastasis detection.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Computational methods for metastasis detection in lymph nodes and characterization of the metastasis-free lymph node microarchitecture: A systematic-narrative hybrid review.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Review
- Publicly available datasets of breast histopathology H&E whole-slide images: A scoping review.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis Detection in Cervical Cancer.Cancers · 2024Article
- A Systematic Comparison of Task Adaptation Techniques for Digital Histopathology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Making the Improbable Possible: Generalizing Models Designed for a Syndrome-Based, Heterogeneous Patient Landscape.Critical care clinics · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Personalized Medicine.Journal of breast cancer · 2023Review
- Deep learning for histopathological segmentation of smooth muscle in the urinary bladder.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Review
- Review
- Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Frozen Tissue Section Analysis in Women with Breast Cancer.Cancer research and treatment · 2023Article
- MediNet: transfer learning approach with MediNet medical visual database.Multimedia tools and applications · 2023Article
- Transfer Learning Approach and Nucleus Segmentation with MedCLNet Colon Cancer Database.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- Investigation of optimal convolutional neural network conditions for thyroid ultrasound image analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Transfer learning-assisted 3D deep learning models for knee osteoarthritis detection: Data from the osteoarthritis initiative.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fast and accurate confirmation of metastasis on the frozen tissue section of intraoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy is an essential tool for critical surgical decisions. However, accurate diagnosis by pathologists is difficult within the time limitations. Training a robust and accurate deep learning model is also difficult owing to the limited number of frozen datasets with high quality labels. To overcome these issues, we validated the effectiveness of transfer learning from CAMELYON16 to improve performance of the convolutional neural network (CNN)-based classification model on our frozen dataset (N = 297) from Asan Medical Center (AMC). Among the 297 whole slide images (WSIs), 157 and 40 WSIs were used to train deep learning models with different dataset ratios at 2, 4, 8, 20, 40, and 100%. The remaining, i.e., 100 WSIs, were used to validate model performance in terms of patch- and slide-level classification. An additional 228 WSIs from Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (SNUBH) were used as an external validation. Three initial weights, i.e., scratch-based (random initialization), ImageNet-based, and CAMELYON16-based models were used to validate their effectiveness in external validation. In the patch-level classification results on the AMC dataset, CAMELYON16-based models trained with a small dataset (up to 40%, i.e., 62 WSIs) showed a significantly higher area under the curve (AUC) of 0.929 than those of the scratch- and ImageNet-based models at 0.897 and 0.919, respectively, while CAMELYON16-based and ImageNet-based models trained with 100% of the training dataset showed comparable AUCs at 0.944 and 0.943, respectively. For the external validation, CAMELYON16-based models showed higher AUCs than those of the scratch- and ImageNet-based models. Model performance for slide feasibility of the transfer learning to enhance model performance was validated in the case of frozen section datasets with limited numbers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.