Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33318419›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2021

Pro- and anti-epileptic roles of microglia.

Shinichi Kinoshita, Ryuta Koyama

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shinichi KinoshitaLaboratory of Chemical Pharmacology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryuta KoyamaLaboratory of Chemical Pharmacology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microglia are brain-resident immune cells that contribute to the maintenance of brain homeostasis. In the epileptic brain, microglia show various activation phenotypes depending on the stage of epileptogenesis. Therefore, it remains unclear whether microglial activation acts in a pro-epileptic or anti-epileptic manner. In mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, one of the most common form of epilepsies, microglia exhibit at least two distinct morphologies, amoeboid shape and ramified shape. Amoeboid microglia are often found in sclerotic area, whereas ramified microglia are mainly found in non-sclerotic area; however, it remains unclear whether these structurally distinct microglia share separate roles in the epileptic brain. Here, we review the roles of the two distinct microglial phenotypes, focusing on their pro- and anti-epileptic roles in terms of inflammatory response, regulation of neurogenesis and microglia-neuron interaction.

Indexed as

epilepsyepileptogenesisinflammatory cytokinesmicroglianeurogenesisneuron-microglia interactionseizure

Identifiers

PMID33318419
PMCPMC8284291
OpenAlexW3111732615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.