Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33318412›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2021

Utility of somatosensory and motor-evoked potentials in reflecting gross and fine motor functions after unilateral cervical spinal cord contusion injury.

Rong Li, Zu-Cheng Huang, Hong-Yan Cui, Zhi-Ping Huang, Jun-Hao Liu, Qing-An Zhu, Yong Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Research progress on rodent models of cervical spinal cord injury].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rong LiInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin; Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, The Hong Kong University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Zu-Cheng HuangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Hong-Yan CuiInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China.
Zhi-Ping HuangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Jun-Hao LiuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Qing-An ZhuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Yong HuInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin; Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, The Hong Kong University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Nanfang Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fine motor skills are thought to rely on the integrity of ascending sensory pathways in the spinal dorsal column as well as descending motor pathways that have a neocortical origin. However, the neurophysiological processes underlying communication between the somatosensory and motor pathways that regulate fine motor skills during spontaneous recovery after spinal cord contusion injury remain unclear. Here, we established a rat model of cervical hemicontusive injury using C5 laminectomy followed by contusional displacement of 1.2 mm (mild injury) or 2.0 mm (severe injury) to the C5 spinal cord. Electrophysiological recordings were performed on the brachial muscles up to 12 weeks after injury to investigate the mechanisms by which spinal cord pathways participate in motor function. After spinal cord contusion injury, the amplitudes of somatosensory and motor-evoked potentials were reduced, and the latencies were increased. The forelimb open field locomotion test, grooming test, rearing test and Montoya staircase test revealed improvement in functions. With increasing time after injury, the amplitudes of somatosensory and motor-evoked potentials in rats with mild spinal cord injury increased gradually, and the latencies gradually shortened. In comparison, the recovery times of somatosensory and motor-evoked potential amplitudes and latencies were longer, and the recovery of motor function was delayed in rats with severe spinal cord injury. Correlation analysis revealed that somatosensory-evoked potential and motor-evoked potential parameters were correlated with gross and fine motor function in rats with mild spinal cord contusion injury. In contrast, only somatosensory-evoked potential amplitude was correlated with fine motor skills in rats with severe spinal cord injury. Our results show that changes in both somatosensory and motor-evoked potentials can reflect the changes in gross and fine motor functions after mild spinal cord contusion injury, and that the change in somatosensory-evoked potential amplitude can also reflect the change in fine motor function after severe spinal cord contusion injury. This study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, China (approval No. NFYY-2017-67) on June 11, 2017.

Indexed as

central nervous systemmotor-evoked potentialmotor functionregenerationrepairsomatosensory-evoked potentialspinal cordspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID33318412
PMCPMC8284273
OpenAlexW3112509246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.