Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33318404›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2021

Positive effects of music therapist's selected auditory stimulation on the autonomic nervous system of patients with disorder of consciousness: a randomized controlled trial.

Xiao-Ying Zhang, Jian-Jun Li, Hai-Tao Lu, Wen-Jia Teng, Song-Huai Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiao-Ying ZhangSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Capital Medical University; China Rehabilitation Science Institute; Beijing Key Laboratory of Neural Injury and Rehabilitation; Center of Neural Injury and Repair, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders; Music Therapy Center, Department of Psychology, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China.
Jian-Jun LiSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Capital Medical University; China Rehabilitation Science Institute; Beijing Key Laboratory of Neural Injury and Rehabilitation; Center of Neural Injury and Repair, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China.
Hai-Tao LuSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Capital Medical University; Department of Neurorehabilitation, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China.
Wen-Jia TengSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Capital Medical University; Music Therapy Center, Department of Psychology, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China.
Song-Huai LiuSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Capital Medical University; Music Therapy Center, Department of Psychology, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CNChina Rehabilitation Research Center · CNChinese Institute for Brain Research · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current randomized controlled trial was performed at the China Rehabilitation Science Institute, China to test the hypothesis that musical auditory stimulation has positive effects on the autonomic nervous system of patients with disorder of consciousness. Although past studies have recommended that patients with disorder of consciousness listen to patient-preferred music, this practice is not universally accepted by researchers. Twenty patients with severe disorder of consciousness listened to either therapist-selected (n = 10, 6 males and 4 females; 43.33 ± 18.76 years old) or patient-preferred (n = 10, 5 males and 5 females, 48.83 ± 18.79 years old) musical therapy, 30 minutes/day, 5 times/week for 6 weeks. The results showed no obvious differences in heart rate variability-related parameters including heart rate, standard deviation of normal-to-normal R-R intervals, and the root-mean-square of successive heartbeat interval differences of successive heartbeat intervals between the two groups of patients. However, percentage of differences exceeding 50 ms between adjacent normal number of intervals, low-frequency power/high-frequency power, high-frequency power norm, low-frequency power norm, and total power were higher in patients receiving therapist-selected music than in patients receiving their own preferred music. In contrast, this relationship was reversed for the high-frequency power and very-low-frequency band. These results suggest that compared with preferred musical stimulation, therapist-selected musical stimulation resulted in higher interactive activity of the autonomic nervous system. Therefore, therapist-selected musical stimulation should be used to arouse the autonomic nervous system of patients with disorder of consciousness. This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of China Rehabilitation Research Center, China (approval No. 2018-022-1) on March 12, 2018 and registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number ChiCTR1800017809) on August 15, 2018.

Indexed as

auditoryautonomic nerve systemdisorder of consciousnessheart ratemisdiagnosismusic therapyprotectionrepairsubjective score

Identifiers

PMID33318404
PMCPMC8284264
OpenAlexW3113030028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.