Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33318086›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2021

Changing media depictions of remote consulting in COVID-19: analysis of UK newspapers.

Gilly Mroz, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Alex Rushforth, Trisha Greenhalgh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Review
  6. Media depictions of primary care teleconsultation safety: a thematic analysis of UK newspapers.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Digital health and care: emerging from pandemic times.BMJ health & care informatics · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. UK newspapers 'on the warpath': media analysis of general practice remote consulting in 2021.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Virtual Care and the Inverse Care Law: Implications for Policy, Practice, Research, Public and Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Socioeconomic differences in help seeking for colorectal cancer symptoms during COVID-19: a UK-wide qualitative interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gilly MrozNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Chrysanthi PapoutsiNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Alex RushforthNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Trisha GreenhalghNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote consulting was introduced quickly into UK general practice in March 2020 as an emergency response to COVID-19. In July 2020, 'remote-first' became long-term government policy.

aimTo explore how this change was portrayed in national newspapers and how depictions changed over time. DESIGN AND

settingThematic analysis of newspaper articles referring to remote GP consultations from two time periods: 2 March-31 May 2020 (period 1) and 30 July-12 August 2020 (period 2).

methodArticles were identified through, and extracted from, LexisNexis Academic UK. A coding system of themes and narrative devices was developed and applied to the data. The analysis was developed iteratively, amending the coding structure as new data were added.

resultsRemote consulting was widely covered in newspapers. Articles in period 1 depicted it positively, equating digital change with progress and linking novel technological solutions with improved efficiency and safety (for example, infection control) in a service that was overdue for modernisation. Articles in period 2 questioned the persistence of a remote-first service now that the pandemic was waning, emphasising, for example, missed diagnoses, challenges to the therapeutic relationship, and digital inequalities.

conclusionAs the first wave of the pandemic came and went, media depictions of remote consulting evolved from an 'efficiency and safety' narrative to a 'risks, inequalities, and lack of choice' narrative. To restore public trust in general practice, public communication should emphasise the wide menu of consulting options now available to patients and measures being taken to assure safety and avoid inequity.

Indexed as

General PracticeNewspapers as TopicRemote ConsultationCOVID-19HumansInformation DisseminationPandemicsUnited KingdomCOVID-19general practicemedia analysisremote consultation

Identifiers

PMID33318086
PMCPMC7759365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.