Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33317761›Full record

ArticleResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP2021

Personal protective practices and pharmacy services delivery by community pharmacists during COVID-19 pandemic: Results from a national survey.

Syed Tabish R Zaidi, Syed Shahzad Hasan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Community pharmacy resiliency during Covid-19 pandemic in Iran: A qualitative study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring Drug Shortages in the United Kingdom.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. BMJ open · 2022
    Article
  10. Panic buying research: A bibliometric review.Nepal journal of epidemiology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Community pharmacists' experiences of working during lockdown.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Syed Tabish R ZaidiSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, LS2 9JT, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom. Electronic address: s.t.r.zaidi@leeds.ac.uk.
Syed Shahzad HasanDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom. Electronic address: s.hasan@hud.ac.uk.
University of Huddersfield · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCoronavirus disease (COVID19) has adversely affected the delivery of various health services. Little is known about the impact of COVID19 on pharmacy services across the United Kingdom (UK). We surveyed community pharmacists across the UK to understand their protective practices, professional and general well-being, and the delivery of pharmacy services during the COVID19 pandemic.

methodsCommunity pharmacists were invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey via the nationwide weekly newsletter of Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee and the local pharmaceutical committees during the second week of May 2020. The survey remained open for 4 weeks.

resultsA total of 206 pharmacists responded to the survey with representations from England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. The majority of pharmacists (>75% or above) reported an increase in customer traffic to their pharmacy and were asking relevant questions from patients with flu-like symptoms before signposting them to the appropriate care. Most pharmacists (>85%) were maintaining a safe distance of 2 m from customers and 72% were wearing an N95 protective mask and 28% were using protective gloves and apron in addition to safe distancing and protective masks. Ninety-nine percent of pharmacists reported drug shortages with 38% and 26% reported significant drug shortages and critical drug shortages causing disruptions beyond over the counter medicines. Eighty-nine percent pharmacists reported inappropriate behaviour from patients or carers with 31% and 16% reported it to be a regular or frequent problem, respectively. Fifty-three% of pharmacists were willing to offer their assistance for mass testing of COVID19 antibodies if adequate training and reimbursement are provided.

conclusionCommunity pharmacists in the UK are facing considerable challenges in terms of personal protection and the delivery of pharmacy services. Inappropriate behaviour from patients and carers towards community pharmacists require urgent attention to ensure a safe working place for all community pharmacists.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunity Pharmacy ServicesCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonal Protective EquipmentPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacistsPhysical DistancingProfessional RoleSurveys and QuestionnairesPharmaceutical PreparationsCommunity pharmacistsCOVID19Drug shortagesPersonal and protective equipmentSocial distancingUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID33317761
PMCPMC7347346
OpenAlexW3041734627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.