Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33317627›Full record

ArticleIMA fungus2020

Using target enrichment sequencing to study the higher-level phylogeny of the largest lichen-forming fungi family: Parmeliaceae (Ascomycota).

Felix Grewe, Claudio Ametrano, Todd J Widhelm, Steven Leavitt, Isabel Distefano, Wetchasart Polyiam, David Pizarro, Mats Wedin, Ana Crespo, Pradeep K Divakar and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IMA fungus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Felix GreweScience & Education, The Grainger Bioinformatics Center, Negaunee Integrative Research Center, Gantz Family Collections Center, and Pritzker Laboratory for Molecular Systematics, The Field Museum, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, USA. fgrewe@fieldmuseum.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2805-5930
Claudio AmetranoScience & Education, The Grainger Bioinformatics Center, Negaunee Integrative Research Center, Gantz Family Collections Center, and Pritzker Laboratory for Molecular Systematics, The Field Museum, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, USA.
Todd J WidhelmScience & Education, The Grainger Bioinformatics Center, Negaunee Integrative Research Center, Gantz Family Collections Center, and Pritzker Laboratory for Molecular Systematics, The Field Museum, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, USA.
Steven LeavittDepartment of Biology and M. L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
Isabel DistefanoScience & Education, The Grainger Bioinformatics Center, Negaunee Integrative Research Center, Gantz Family Collections Center, and Pritzker Laboratory for Molecular Systematics, The Field Museum, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, USA.
Wetchasart PolyiamLichen Research Unit, Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Ramkhamhaeng University, Ramkhamhaeng 24 Road, Bangkok, 10240, Thailand.
David PizarroDepartamento de Farmacología, Farmacognosia y Botánica, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Mats WedinDepartment of Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 50007, SE-104 05, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ana CrespoDepartamento de Farmacología, Farmacognosia y Botánica, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Pradeep K DivakarDepartamento de Farmacología, Farmacognosia y Botánica, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
H Thorsten LumbschScience & Education, The Grainger Bioinformatics Center, Negaunee Integrative Research Center, Gantz Family Collections Center, and Pritzker Laboratory for Molecular Systematics, The Field Museum, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia Tecnología y Telecomunicaciones PID2019-105312GB-I00Universidad Complutense de Madrid PR87/19-22637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parmeliaceae is the largest family of lichen-forming fungi with a worldwide distribution. We used a target enrichment data set and a qualitative selection method for 250 out of 350 genes to infer the phylogeny of the major clades in this family including 81 taxa, with both subfamilies and all seven major clades previously recognized in the subfamily Parmelioideae. The reduced genome-scale data set was analyzed using concatenated-based Bayesian inference and two different Maximum Likelihood analyses, and a coalescent-based species tree method. The resulting topology was strongly supported with the majority of nodes being fully supported in all three concatenated-based analyses. The two subfamilies and each of the seven major clades in Parmelioideae were strongly supported as monophyletic. In addition, most backbone relationships in the topology were recovered with high nodal support. The genus Parmotrema was found to be polyphyletic and consequently, it is suggested to accept the genus Crespoa to accommodate the species previously placed in Parmotrema subgen. Crespoa. This study demonstrates the power of reduced genome-scale data sets to resolve phylogenetic relationships with high support. Due to lower costs, target enrichment methods provide a promising avenue for phylogenetic studies including larger taxonomic/specimen sampling than whole genome data would allow.

Indexed as

ASTRALBayesian interferenceHybPiperMaximum likelihoodNext-generation sequencingParmelioideaeParmotremaPhylogenomicsProtoparmelioideaeTarget capture

Identifiers

PMID33317627
PMCPMC7734834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.