Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33317594›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2020

Local signs at insertion site and catheter-related bloodstream infections: an observational post hoc analysis using individual data of four RCTs.

Niccolò Buetti, Stéphane Ruckly, Jean-Christophe Lucet, Lila Bouadma, Maité Garrouste-Orgeas, Carole Schwebel, Olivier Mimoz, Bertrand Souweine, Jean-François Timsit

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Niccolò BuettiUniversity of Paris, INSERM, IAME, 75006, Paris, France. niccolo.buetti@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8096-1834
Stéphane RucklyUniversity of Paris, INSERM, IAME, 75006, Paris, France.
Jean-Christophe LucetUniversity of Paris, INSERM, IAME, 75006, Paris, France.
Lila BouadmaUniversity of Paris, INSERM, IAME, 75006, Paris, France.
Maité Garrouste-OrgeasUniversity of Paris, INSERM, IAME, 75006, Paris, France.
Carole SchwebelMedical Intensive Care Unit, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble 1 University, La Tronche, France.
Olivier MimozServices Des Urgences Adultes and SAMU 86, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, 86021, Poitiers, France.
Bertrand SouweineMedical ICU, Gabriel-Montpied University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jean-François TimsitUniversity of Paris, INSERM, IAME, 75006, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FR

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (CH) P400PM_183865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known on the association between local signs and intravascular catheter infections. This study aimed to evaluate the association between local signs at removal and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI), and which clinical conditions may predict CRBSIs if inflammation at insertion site is present.

methodsWe used individual data from four multicenter randomized controlled trials in intensive care units (ICUs) that evaluated various prevention strategies for arterial and central venous catheters. We used multivariate logistic regressions in order to evaluate the association between ≥ 1 local sign, redness, pain, non-purulent discharge and purulent discharge, and CRBSI. Moreover, we assessed the probability for each local sign to observe CRBSI in subgroups of clinically relevant conditions.

resultsA total of 6976 patients and 14,590 catheters (101,182 catheter-days) and 114 CRBSI from 25 ICUs with described local signs were included. More than one local sign, redness, pain, non-purulent discharge, and purulent discharge at removal were observed in 1938 (13.3%), 1633 (11.2%), 59 (0.4%), 251 (1.7%), and 102 (0.7%) episodes, respectively. After adjusting on confounders, ≥ 1 local sign, redness, non-purulent discharge, and purulent discharge were associated with CRBSI. The presence of ≥ 1 local sign increased the probability to observe CRBSI in the first 7 days of catheter maintenance (OR 6.30 vs. 2.61 [> 7 catheter-days], p

conclusionsLocal signs were significantly associated with CRBSI in the ICU. In the first 7 days of catheter maintenance, local signs increased the probability to observe CRBSI.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCatheterization, Central VenousCatheter-Related InfectionsCentral Venous CathetersFemaleFranceHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioQualitative ResearchRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSepsisCatheter-related bloodstream infectionExit-siteInsertion siteIntravascular catheterIntravascular catheter infectionLocal sign

Identifiers

PMID33317594
PMCPMC7737269
OpenAlexW3112174296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.