SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2020
Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses.
Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07172451 (Efficacy and Safety of Balanced Gelatin Solution for Fluid Infusion in Sepsis Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Balanced Gelatin Solution for Fluid Infusion in Sepsis Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Multicenter, Adaptive Designed, Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fluid resuscitation in adults with severe infection and sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical efficacy of various resuscitation fluids in the management of sepsis in postoperative surgical and trauma patients: a systematic review and meta--analysis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024Pooled it
- Guideline
- European Society of Intensive Care Medicine clinical practice guideline on fluid therapy in adult critically ill patients. Part 1: the choice of resuscitation fluids.Intensive care medicine · 2024Guideline
- Evaluating the efficacy of different volume resuscitation strategies in acute pancreatitis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Pooled it
- Study based on bibliometric analysis: potential research trends in fluid management for sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of balanced crystalloids versus normal saline in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Pooled it
- The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Guideline
- Heterogeneity in the Effect of Early Goal-Directed Therapy for Septic Shock: A Secondary Analysis of Two Multicenter International Trials.Critical care medicine · 2025Trial
- Gelatin 4% and hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.42) impair clot formation in a human ex vivo whole-blood resuscitation model.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of albumin utilization, guideline compliance, and cost in intensive care units: a multicenter point prevalence study.BMC health services research · 2026Observational
- Correlation between early cumulative fluid balance and 90-day all-cause mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Severe trauma care: advances and future directions in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques and information technology support.Medical review (2021) · 2026Article
- Use of Human Serum Albumin in Critically Ill Patients: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Implications of Fluid Resuscitation in Critically Ill Patients.Cureus · 2026Review
- Comparison of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4World journal of cardiology · 2026Article
- Timing of lactated Ringer's administration relative to Sepsis-3 diagnosis and 28-day mortality: A retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.SAGE open medicine · 2026Article
- Restrictive hypertonic saline resuscitation is associated with less intestinal injury after hemorrhagic shock in rats and with coordinated changes in MALAT1, miR-145-5p, and BNIP3 expression.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Rethinking Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock: A Phase-Adapted, Endothelium-Sparing Approach to Mitigate Capillary Leak.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Balanced crystalloids versus saline for critically ill patients: an overview of systematic reviews.Critical care science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCrystalloids and different component colloids, used for volume resuscitation, are sometimes associated with various adverse effects. Clinical trial findings for such fluid types in different patients' conditions are conflicting. Whether the mortality benefit of balanced crystalloid than saline can be inferred from sepsis to other patient group is uncertain, and adverse effect profile is not comprehensive. This study aims to compare the survival benefits and adverse effects of seven fluid types with network meta-analysis in sepsis, surgical, trauma, and traumatic brain injury patients.
methodsSearched databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL) and reference lists of relevant articles occurred from inception until January 2020. Studies on critically ill adults requiring fluid resuscitation were included. Intervention studies reported on balanced crystalloid, saline, iso-oncotic albumin, hyperoncotic albumin, low molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch (L-HES), high molecular weight HES, and gelatin. Network meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects model to calculate odds ratio (OR) and mean difference. Risk of Bias tool 2.0 was used to assess bias. Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) web application was used to rate confidence in synthetic evidence.
resultsFifty-eight trials (n = 26,351 patients) were identified. Seven fluid types were evaluated. Among patients with sepsis and surgery, balanced crystalloids and albumin achieved better survival, fewer acute kidney injury, and smaller blood transfusion volumes than saline and L-HES. In those with sepsis, balanced crystalloids significantly reduced mortality more than saline (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.74-0.95) and L-HES (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.69-0.95) and reduced acute kidney injury more than L-HES (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65-0.99). However, they required the greatest resuscitation volume among all fluid types, especially in trauma patients. In patients with traumatic brain injury, saline and L-HES achieved lower mortality than albumin and balanced crystalloids; especially saline was significantly superior to iso-oncotic albumin (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.87).
conclusionsOur network meta-analysis found that balanced crystalloids and albumin decreased mortality more than L-HES and saline in sepsis patients; however, saline or L-HES was better than iso-oncotic albumin or balanced crystalloids in traumatic brain injury patients.
trial registrationPROSPERO website, registration number: CRD42018115641).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.