Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2020
High flow nasal therapy versus noninvasive ventilation as initial ventilatory strategy in COPD exacerbation: a multicenter non-inferiority randomized trial.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 71 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
High Flow Nasal Therapy Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in Mild to Moderate Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: A Non-inferiority Randomized Trial
The Physiologic Effects of Asymmetrical Versus Conventional High-flow Nasal Cannula in Acute Respiratory Failure. A Randomized Crossover Study.
Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Effect of High Flow Nasal Cannula Treatment on Carbon Dioxide-levels in COPD- Patients With Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, Using Either OptiflowTM or Optiflow+DuetTM Nasal Cannula
A High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Single-blind Randomized Trial
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy and Non-Invasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Pooled it
- Respiratory Support in the Emergency Department: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2026Pooled it
- High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation for Prevention of Reintubation in High-Risk Critically Ill Patients (HIGH-FLOW OXY): An Informative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Critical care explorations · 2026Pooled it
- High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The clinical respiratory journal · 2026Pooled it
- High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in the Treatment of Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Physiological Outcomes.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of non-invasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of clinical outcomes between high-flow nasal cannula and non-invasive ventilation in acute exacerbation of COPD: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Pooled it
- High flow nasal cannula versus noninvasive ventilation in the treatment of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The clinical respiratory journal · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of High Flow Nasal Therapy with Non-Invasive Ventilation and Conventional Oxygen Therapy for Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023Pooled it
- High-Flow Nasal Oxygen versus Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Canadian respiratory journal · 2023Pooled it
- High-flow nasal cannula versus non-invasive ventilation for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Pooled it
- High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy versus Non-Invasive Ventilation for AECOPD Patients After Extubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022Pooled it
- Monitoring the patient-ventilator asynchrony during non-invasive ventilation.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- High flow nasal oxygen for acute type two respiratory failure: a systematic review.F1000Research · 2021Pooled it
- High-velocity nasal insufflation versus noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for moderate acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the emergency department: A randomized clinical trial.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025Trial
- Trial
- High flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus non-invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute-moderate hypercapnic respiratory failure: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Trial
- Trial
- High-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy in acute COPD exacerbation with mild hypercapnia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Trial
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy and safety of high flow nasal therapy (HFNT) in patients with acute hypercapnic exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are unclear. Our aim was to evaluate the short-term effect of HFNT versus NIV in patients with mild-to-moderate AECOPD, with the hypothesis that HFNT is non-inferior to NIV on CO
methodsWe performed a multicenter, non-inferiority randomized trial comparing HFNT and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in nine centers in Italy. Patients were eligible if presented with mild-to-moderate AECOPD (arterial pH 7.25-7.35, PaCO
resultsSeventy-nine patients were analyzed (80 patients randomized). Mean differences for PaCO
conclusionsHFNT was statistically non-inferior to NIV as initial ventilatory support in decreasing PaCO
trial registrationThe study was prospectively registered on December 12, 2017, in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03370666).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.