Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33317553›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2020

Factors associated with drug checking service utilization among people who use drugs in a Canadian setting.

Viseth Long, Jaime Arredondo, Lianping Ti, Cameron Grant, Kora DeBeck, M-J Milloy, Mark Lysyshyn, Evan Wood, Thomas Kerr, Kanna Hayashi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A survey of North American drug checking services operating in 2022.The International journal on drug policy · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Viseth LongBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jaime ArredondoBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lianping TiBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Cameron GrantBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kora DeBeckBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
M-J MilloyBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Mark LysyshynVancouver Coastal Health Authority, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Evan WoodBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Thomas KerrBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kanna HayashiBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada. bccsu-kh@bccsu.ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-3843-2928
University of British Columbia · CASimon Fraser University · CABritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use · CAVancouver Coastal Health · CA

Funding

Vancouver Drug Users Study: The Impacts of Evolving Drug Use Patterns on HIV/AIDSU01DA038886 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI DEBECK, KORA, HAYASHI, KANNA · 2015 to 2024
$12.1M
Impacts of universal access to HIV/AIDS care among HIV+ injection drug usersU01DA021525 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI MILLOY, M-J · 2017 to 2024
$4.3M
CIHR MSH-141971CIHR SMN-139148NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA021525NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA038886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe United States and Canada are amidst an opioid overdose crisis, with the Canadian province of British Columbia (BC) among the hardest hit. In response, drug checking services (DCS) have been introduced in this setting as a novel pilot harm reduction intervention though little is known about usage rates. Therefore, we sought to identify factors associated with drug checking uptake among people who use drugs (PWUD) in Vancouver, BC.

methodsData were derived from three ongoing prospective cohort studies of PWUD in Vancouver between June and November 2018. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with self-reported DCS utilization in the past 6 months among participants at high risk of fentanyl exposure (i.e., those self-reporting illicit opioid use or testing positive for fentanyl via urine drug screen).

resultsAmong 828 eligible participants, including 451 (55%) males, 176 (21%) reported recent use of DCS. In multivariable analyses, factors significantly associated with DCS utilization included: homelessness (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.47; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.01-2.13) and involvement in drug dealing (AOR 1.59; 95% CI 1.05-2.39).

conclusionsIn our sample of PWUD, uptake of DCS was low, although those who were homeless, a sub-population known to be at a heightened risk of overdose, were more likely to use the services. Those involved in drug dealing were also more likely to use the services, which may imply potential for improving drug market safety. Further evaluation of drug checking is warranted.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidPharmaceutical PreparationsBritish ColumbiaFentanylHumansMaleProspective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylPharmaceutical PreparationsDrug checkingDrug dealingFentanylOpioidsOverdoseVancouver

Identifiers

PMID33317553
PMCPMC7737352
OpenAlexW3111175419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.