Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33317474›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

New cut-off values for screening of trisomy 21, 18 and open neural tube defects (ONTD) during the second trimester in pregnant women with advanced maternal age.

Yiming Chen, Xue Wang, Liyao Li, Sha Lu, Zhifen Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yiming ChenDepartment of Prenatal Diagnosis and Screening Center, Hangzhou Women's Hospital (Hangzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital), No. 369, kunpeng Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou Zhejiang, 310008, China. cxy40344@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1532-6049
Xue WangNanjing Medical University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210029, China.
Liyao LiDepartment of Prenatal Diagnosis and Screening Center, Hangzhou Women's Hospital (Hangzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital), No. 369, kunpeng Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou Zhejiang, 310008, China.
Sha LuDepartment of Prenatal Diagnosis and Screening Center, Hangzhou Women's Hospital (Hangzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital), No. 369, kunpeng Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou Zhejiang, 310008, China.
Zhifen ZhangNanjing Medical University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210029, China. zhangzf@zju.edu.cn.
Hangzhou Women’s Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

Hangzhou Health Science and Technology Plan Project 2017A55Hangzhou Science and Technology Plan Guide Project / Agriculture and Social Development 20181228Y13Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation / Public Welfare Technology Research Plan / Social Development LGF19H040006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo determine whether advanced maternal age (AMA) causes changes in the maternal serum markers of Trisomy 21, 18 and open neural tube defects (ONTD) during the second trimester of pregnancy. Our research aims to develop new cut-off values for AMA in order to reduce the need for further invasive testing.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study involved 12,739 pregnant women with AMA and 197,101 pregnant women with non-AMA. We then compared the two groups with respect to the positive rate and positive predictive value (PPV) of Trisomy 21, 18 and ONTD. Pregnant women with Trisomy 21, 18 and ONTD were diagnosed by karyotyping the amniotic fluid and by ultrasound diagnosis.

resultsCompared to the non-AMA group, the multiple of the median (MOM) of free beta- human chorionic gonadotropin (free β-hCG), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and the risk value forTrisomy 21, were significantly higher in the AMA group (all P < 0.001). The positive rates of Trisomy 21, 18, and ONTD in the AMA group were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P < 0.001). In the AMA group, the PPVs for Trisomy 21 and other deformities were significantly higher (all P < 0.001), although the PPVs for Trisomy 18 and ONTD were similar to those of the non-AMA group. The area under the curve (AUC) values for the AMA group were higher than the non-AMA group, based on free β-hCG MoM, AFP MoM, and the risk value of Trisomy 21. The cut-off value for the risk value of Trisomy 21 was 1/172 for the AMA, group and 1/780 for the non-AMA group.

conclusionsThe positive rates for Trisomy 21, 18 and ONTD, and the PPV for Trisomy 21 and other deformities were significantly higher in the AMA group. It is essential for pregnant women with AMA to be tested using appropriate cut-off values of serum markers screening for Trisomy 21 during the second trimester of pregnancy to improve the efficacy of prenatal screening and reduce the need for further invasive testing.

Indexed as

Maternal AgeAdultalpha-FetoproteinsAmniocentesisBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesChorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, HumanDown SyndromeFemaleHumansNeural Tube DefectsPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, SecondRetrospective StudiesROC Curvealpha-FetoproteinsBiomarkersChorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, HumanAdvanced maternal age;alpha-fetoproteinDown syndromeFree beta human chorionic gonadotropinPositive predictive value (PPV)Positive rate

Identifiers

PMID33317474
PMCPMC7734716
OpenAlexW3111148459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.