ArticleCancers2020
Proper Read Filtering Method to Adequately Analyze Whole-Transcriptome Sequencing and RNA Based Immune Repertoire Sequencing Data for Tumor Milieu Research.
Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Analysis of the T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire is essential to characterize the extensive collections of T-cell populations with recognizing antigens in cancer research, and whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS) and immune repertoire sequencing (IR-seq) are commonly used for this measure. To date, no standard read filtering method for IR measurement has been presented. We assessed the diversity of the TCR repertoire results from the paired WTS and IR-seq data of 31 multiple myeloma (MM) patients. To invent an adequate read filtering strategy for IR analysis, we conducted comparisons with WTS results. First, our analyses for determining an optimal threshold for selecting clonotypes showed that the clonotypes supported by a single read largely affected the shared clonotypes and manifested distinct patterns of mapping qualities, unlike clonotypes with multiple reads. Second, although IR-seq could reflect a wider TCR region with a higher capture rate than WTS, an adequate comparison with the removal of unwanted bias from potential sequencing errors was possible only after applying our read filtering strategy. As a result, we suggest that TCR repertoire analysis be carried out through IR-seq to produce reliable and accurate results, along with the removal of single-read clonotypes, to conduct immune research in cancer using high-throughput sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.