Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33317016›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

The Impact of Caring and Killing on Physiological and Psychometric Measures of Stress in Animal Shelter Employees: A Pilot Study.

Allison Andrukonis, Nathaniel J Hall, Alexandra Protopopova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Compassion Fatigue and Coping Mechanisms of Laboratory Animal Professionals from Europe, China, and Japan.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Allison AndrukonisDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Nathaniel J HallDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7465-5470
Alexandra ProtopopovaDepartment of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Texas Tech University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal shelter employees are in a unique position where they care for, and later kill, the same animals. The aim of our exploratory study was to assess whether "caring" and/or "killing" evokes physiological and psychometric indicators of stress in employees. Experiment 1 compared three careers that kill regularly, but involve varying degrees of husbandry (

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalEuthanasia, AnimalPsychometricsQuality of LifeStress, PsychologicalAnimalsFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneMalePilot ProjectsHydrocortisoneanimal-care employeesanimal sheltercompassion fatigueoccupational stress

Identifiers

PMID33317016
PMCPMC7764342
OpenAlexW3112273196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.