Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33316955›Full record

ArticlePolymers2020

Biocompatibility and Physico-Chemical Properties of Highly Porous PLA/HA Scaffolds for Bone Reconstruction.

Anna Zimina, Fedor Senatov, Rajan Choudhary, Evgeniy Kolesnikov, Natalya Anisimova, Mikhail Kiselevskiy, Polina Orlova, Natalia Strukova, Mariya Generalova, Vasily Manskikh and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Recent Advances in Scaffolds for Guided Bone Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anna ZiminaNational University of Science and Technology "MISIS", Center for composite materials, Leninskiy pr. 4, 119049 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8980-3755
Fedor SenatovNational University of Science and Technology "MISIS", Center for composite materials, Leninskiy pr. 4, 119049 Moscow, Russia.
Rajan ChoudharyNational University of Science and Technology "MISIS", Center for composite materials, Leninskiy pr. 4, 119049 Moscow, Russia.
Evgeniy KolesnikovNational University of Science and Technology "MISIS", Center for composite materials, Leninskiy pr. 4, 119049 Moscow, Russia.
Natalya AnisimovaNational University of Science and Technology "MISIS", Center for composite materials, Leninskiy pr. 4, 119049 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4370-6578
Mikhail KiselevskiyNational University of Science and Technology "MISIS", Center for composite materials, Leninskiy pr. 4, 119049 Moscow, Russia.
Polina OrlovaN. F. Gamaleya National Research Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Gamaleya Str. 18, 123098 Moscow, Russia.
Natalia StrukovaN. F. Gamaleya National Research Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Gamaleya Str. 18, 123098 Moscow, Russia.
Mariya GeneralovaN. F. Gamaleya National Research Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Gamaleya Str. 18, 123098 Moscow, Russia.
Vasily ManskikhN. F. Gamaleya National Research Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Gamaleya Str. 18, 123098 Moscow, Russia.
Alexander GromovN. F. Gamaleya National Research Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Gamaleya Str. 18, 123098 Moscow, Russia.
Anna KaryaginaN. F. Gamaleya National Research Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Gamaleya Str. 18, 123098 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2580-3489

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 16-15-00133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The major problem in bone tissue engineering is the development of scaffolds which can simultaneously meet the requirements of porous structure, as well as have the ability to guide the regeneration of damaged tissue by biological fixation. Composites containing biodegradable matrix and bioactive filler are the new hope in this research field. Herein we employed a simple and facile solvent casting particulate-leaching method for producing polylactide acid/hydroxyapatite (PLA/HA) composites at room temperature. FT-IR analysis confirmed the existence of necessary functional groups associated with the PLA/HA composite, whereas energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra indicated the uniform distribution of hydroxyapatite particles in the polymer matrix. The beehive-like surface morphology of the composites revealed the presence of macropores, ranged from 300 to 400 μm, whereas the thickness of the pores was noticed to be 1-2 μm. The total porosity of the scaffolds, calculated by hydrostatic weighing, was found to be 79%. The water contact angle of pure PLA was decreased from 83.6 ± 1.91° to 62.4 ± 4.17° due to the addition of hydroxyapatite in the polymer matrix. Thus, the wettability of the polymeric biomaterial could be increased by preparing their composites with hydroxyapatite. The adhesion of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells over the surface of PLA/HA scaffolds was 3.2 times (

Indexed as

cell viabilitycompositesin vivo studiesmaxillofacial reconstructionpolylactideporositysurface wettability

Identifiers

PMID33316955
PMCPMC7764020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.