ArticleBiology2020
Literature on Applied Machine Learning in Metagenomic Classification: A Scoping Review.
Article in Biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- HVSeeker: a deep-learning-based method for identification of host and viral DNA sequences.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Machine learning for microbiologists.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024Review
- Deep learning methods in metagenomics: a review.Microbial genomics · 2024Review
- Enhancing Taxonomic Categorization of DNA Sequences with Deep Learning: A Multi-Label Approach.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Prediction Models for Intrauterine Growth Restriction Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Advancing microbiome research with machine learning: key findings from the ML4Microbiome COST action.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Predicting High Blood Pressure Using DNA Methylome-Based Machine Learning Models.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Predicting residues involved in anti-DNA autoantibodies with limited neural networks.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- The ethics of machine learning-based clinical decision support: an analysis through the lens of professionalisation theory.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Literature on Applied Machine Learning in Metagenomic Classification: A Scoping Review.Biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Applied machine learning in bioinformatics is growing as computer science slowly invades all research spheres. With the arrival of modern next-generation DNA sequencing algorithms, metagenomics is becoming an increasingly interesting research field as it finds countless practical applications exploiting the vast amounts of generated data. This study aims to scope the scientific literature in the field of metagenomic classification in the time interval 2008-2019 and provide an evolutionary timeline of data processing and machine learning in this field. This study follows the scoping review methodology and PRISMA guidelines to identify and process the available literature. Natural Language Processing (NLP) is deployed to ensure efficient and exhaustive search of the literary corpus of three large digital libraries: IEEE, PubMed, and Springer. The search is based on keywords and properties looked up using the digital libraries' search engines. The scoping review results reveal an increasing number of research papers related to metagenomic classification over the past decade. The research is mainly focused on metagenomic classifiers, identifying scope specific metrics for model evaluation, data set sanitization, and dimensionality reduction. Out of all of these subproblems, data preprocessing is the least researched with considerable potential for improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.