Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33316575›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2021

Phages in vaccine design and immunity; mechanisms and mysteries.

Christiaan R de Vries, Qingquan Chen, Sally Demirdjian, Gernot Kaber, Arya Khosravi, Dan Liu, Jonas D Van Belleghem, Paul L Bollyky

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Disarm The Bacteria: What Temperate Phages Can Do.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christiaan R de VriesDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Qingquan ChenDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Sally DemirdjianDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Gernot KaberDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Arya KhosraviDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Dan LiuDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Jonas D Van BelleghemDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Paul L BollykyDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States. Electronic address: pbollyky@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development Core (KL2)KL2TR003143 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ASCH, STEVEN M. · 2019 to 2023
$8.7M
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASEST32AI007502 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Prasanna Jagannathan, DAVID A. RELMAN · 1995 to 2026
$6.8M
Heparanase and Regulatory T cell Stability and FunctionR21AI133240 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOLLYKY, PAUL L · 2018 to 2019
$438k
Biofilms and Bacteriophages in Chronic Wound InfectionsR21AI133370 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOLLYKY, PAUL L · 2017 to 2017
$319k
Immunization against Pf bacteriophage in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infectionK08AI151089 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DE VRIES, CHRISTIAAN ROBERT · 2021 to 2021
$162k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003143NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI151089NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI133240NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI133370NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophages have attracted extensive interest in vaccine design. This includes the use of phage display technology to select antigens, the use of engineered phages displaying target antigens in vaccine formulations, and phage DNA vaccines. However, the development of these approaches is limited in part by uncertainty regarding the underlying mechanisms by which phages elicit immunity. This has stymied the clinical development of this technology. Here we review the immunology of phage vaccines and highlight the gaps in our knowledge regarding the underlying mechanisms. First, we review the basic biology of phages and their use in vaccines. Next we discuss what is known about the mechanisms of immunity against engineered phages and phage DNA. Finally, we highlight the gaps in our understanding regarding the immunogenicity of these preparations. We argue that mechanistic insight into the immunology of phage vaccines is essential for the further development and clinical utility of these technologies.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesVaccinesCell Surface Display TechniquesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID33316575
PMCPMC8137517
OpenAlexW3110774110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.