Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33316501›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)2021

An emerging source of plastic pollution: Environmental presence of plastic personal protective equipment (PPE) debris related to COVID-19 in a metropolitan city.

Justine Ammendolia, Jacquelyn Saturno, Amy L Brooks, Shoshanah Jacobs, Jenna R Jambeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Facemask: Protection or threat?Marine pollution bulletin · 2023
    Article
  20. Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Justine AmmendoliaCanadian Ocean Literacy Coalition, Canadian Museum of Nature, 1740 Pink Road Natural Heritage Campus, Gatineau, Quebec, J9J 3N7, Canada. Electronic address: jammendolia@mun.ca.
Jacquelyn SaturnoSchool of Fisheries, Fisheries and Marine Institute of Memorial University, 155 Ridge Road, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1C 5R3, Canada.
Amy L BrooksCollege of Engineering, New Materials Institute, Center for Circular Materials Management, University of Georgia, Riverbend Research Lab South, 220 Riverbend Road, Athens, GA, 30602, United States.
Shoshanah JacobsDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Jenna R JambeckCollege of Engineering, New Materials Institute, Center for Circular Materials Management, University of Georgia, Riverbend Research Lab South, 220 Riverbend Road, Athens, GA, 30602, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an unprecedented surge of production, consumption, and disposal of personal protective equipment (PPE) including face masks, disposable gloves, and disinfectant wipes, which are often made of single use plastic. Widespread public use of these items has imposed pressure on municipalities to properly collect and dispose of potentially infectious PPE. There has been a lack of structured monitoring efforts to quantify the emerging trend of improperly disposed of PPE debris. In this study, we present a baseline monitoring survey to describe the spatial distribution of PPE debris during the COVID-19 pandemic from the metropolitan city of Toronto, Canada. Our objectives were to: (1) quantify PPE debris types among surveyed areas and; (2) identify PPE debris densities and accumulation of surveyed areas. A total of 1306 PPE debris items were documented, with the majority being disposable gloves (44%), followed by face masks (31%), and disinfecting wipes (25%). Of the face masks, 97% were designed for single use while only 3% were reusable. Of the surveyed locations, the highest daily average densities of PPE debris were recorded in the large and medium-sized grocery store parking lots and the hospital district (0.00475 items/m

Indexed as

COVID-19Personal Protective EquipmentCanadaCitiesHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-ProfessionalPandemicsPlasticsSARS-CoV-2PlasticsCOVID-19Personal protective equipment (PPE)PlasticsSARS-CoV-2Single-use plastics

Identifiers

PMID33316501
PMCPMC7833877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.