Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33316367›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of disease2021

Neural endophenotypes and predictors of laryngeal dystonia penetrance and manifestation.

Sanaz Khosravani, Gang Chen, Laurie J Ozelius, Kristina Simonyan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Brain network pathophysiology in dystonia.Dystonia (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Temporal Signature of Task-Specificity in Isolated Focal Laryngeal Dystonia.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sanaz KhosravaniDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Gang ChenNational Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Laurie J OzeliusDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Kristina SimonyanDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: Kristina_Simonyan@meei.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USNational Institute of Mental Health · US

Funding

Imaging genetics of spasmodic dysphoniaR01DC011805 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI Kristina Simonyan · 2012 to 2026
$8.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focal dystonias are the most common forms of isolated dystonia; however, the etiopathophysiological signatures of disorder penetrance and clinical manifestation remain unclear. Using an imaging genetics approach, we investigated functional and structural representations of neural endophenotypes underlying the penetrance and manifestation of laryngeal dystonia in families, including 21 probands and 21 unaffected relatives, compared to 32 unrelated healthy controls. We further used a supervised machine-learning algorithm to predict the risk for dystonia development in susceptible individuals based on neural features of identified endophenotypes. We found that abnormalities in prefrontal-parietal cortex, thalamus, and caudate nucleus were commonly shared between patients and their unaffected relatives, representing an intermediate endophenotype of laryngeal dystonia. Machine learning classified 95.2% of unaffected relatives as patients rather than healthy controls, substantiating that these neural alterations represent the endophenotypic marker of dystonia penetrance, independent of its symptomatology. Additional abnormalities in premotor-parietal-temporal cortical regions, caudate nucleus, and cerebellum were present only in patients but not their unaffected relatives, likely representing a secondary endophenotype of dystonia manifestation. Based on alterations in the parietal cortex and caudate nucleus, the machine learning categorized 28.6% of unaffected relative as patients, indicating their increased lifetime risk for developing clinical manifestation of dystonia. The identified endophenotypic neural markers may be implemented for screening of at-risk individuals for dystonia development, selection of families for genetic studies of novel variants based on their risk for disease penetrance, or stratification of patients who would respond differently to a particular treatment in clinical trials.

Indexed as

EndophenotypesPenetranceAdultAgedBrainCase-Control StudiesCaudate NucleusCerebellumDystonic DisordersFamilyFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansLaryngeal DiseasesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleBrain imagingDystoniaEndophenotypes

Identifiers

PMID33316367
PMCPMC8284879
OpenAlexW3113045725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.