ReviewAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2021
The evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines in the United States.
Review in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The Michigan Plan for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare in Pregnancy Prenatal Care Recommendations.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2021Guideline
- Optimal group and individual prenatal care visit patterns and preterm birth.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Trial
- Inflammatory markers in serum and placenta in a randomized controlled trial of group prenatal care.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2023Trial
- Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Group Versus Individual Prenatal Care on Psychosocial Outcomes.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2023Trial
- Group vs traditional prenatal care for improving racial equity in preterm birth and low birthweight: the Centering and Racial Disparities randomized clinical trial study.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022Trial
- Racial microaggressions in prenatal care settings and perceived quality of prenatal care among Black/African American women.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Associations between wildland fire smoke PMEnvironmental health : a global access science source · 2026Article
- Assessment of the Adequacy of Prenatal Care With Different Evaluation Indices Using Maternal and Fetal Outcomes: A Cross-Sectional Study.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2026Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the quality of life in pregnancy scale (PREG-QOL): a translation and validation study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Maternal and fetal health status assessment by using machine learning on optical 3D body scans.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Prospective Comparative Study on the Relationship Between Adverse Maternal and Fetal Outcomes and the Total Number of Antenatal Visits: Evaluating the Focused Antenatal Care Model and Assessment of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.Oman medical journal · 2026Article
- Temporal trends in lupus pregnancy over four decades in a referral centre: pregnancy planning and hydroxychloroquine use are associated with improved outcomes.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2026Article
- Disparities in Prenatal Care Utilization in the United States.Maternal and child health journal · 2025Article
- The roles of COVID-19 pandemic exposure and telehealth in prenatal care access for rural and racial minority communities in the United States: A retrospective cohort study.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025Article
- Can early prenatal care initiation reduce racial inequalities in birth outcomes? A causal decomposition approach.SSM - population health · 2025Article
- Postpartum care screenings by care modality among US mothers, 2020-2021.AJOG global reports · 2025Article
- The Impact of Prenatal Care on the Prevention of Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Global Health Interventions.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Society for Maternal-Fetal Special Statement: Transforming the maternity care team model.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Sociodemographic factors associated with prenatal care utilization in Arkansas, United States.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic led to some of the most drastic changes in clinical care delivery ever seen in the United States. Almost overnight, providers of prenatal care adopted virtual visits and reduced visit schedules. These changes stood in stark contrast to the 12 to 14 in-person prenatal visit schedule that had been previously recommended for almost a century. As maternity care providers consider what prenatal care delivery changes we should maintain following the acute pandemic, we may gain insight from understanding the evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines. In this paper, we start by sketching out the relatively unstructured beginnings of prenatal care in the 19th century. Most medical care fell within the domain of laypeople, and childbirth was a central feature of female domestic culture. We explore how early discoveries about "toxemia" created the groundwork for future prenatal care interventions, including screening of urine and blood pressure-which in turn created a need for routine prenatal care visits. We then discuss the organization of the medical profession, including the field of obstetrics and gynecology. In the early 20th century, new data increasingly revealed high rates of both infant and maternal mortalities, leading to a greater emphasis on prenatal care. These discoveries culminated in the first codification of a prenatal visit schedule in 1930 by the Children's Bureau. Surprisingly, this schedule remained essentially unchanged for almost a century. Through the founding of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, significant technological advancements in laboratory testing and ultrasonography, and calls of the National Institutes of Health Task Force for changes in prenatal care delivery in 1989, prenatal care recommendations continued to be the same as they had been in 1930-monthly visits until 28 weeks' gestation, bimonthly visits until 36 weeks' gestation, and weekly visits until delivery. However, coronavirus disease 2019 forced us to change, to reconsider both the need for in-person visits and frequency of visits. Currently, as we transition from the acute pandemic, we should consider how to use what we have learned in this unprecedented time to shape future prenatal care. Lessons from a century of prenatal care provide valuable insights to inform the next generation of prenatal care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.