Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33315963›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

ANOVA-HD: Analysis of variance when both input and output layers are high-dimensional.

Gustavo de Los Campos, Torsten Pook, Agustin Gonzalez-Reymundez, Henner Simianer, George Mias, Ana I Vazquez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gustavo de Los CamposEpidemiology & Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5692-7129
Torsten PookDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Integrated Breeding Research, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7874-8500
Agustin Gonzalez-ReymundezGenetics and Genome Sciences Graduate Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2249-8335
Henner SimianerDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Integrated Breeding Research, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
George MiasInstitute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9083-1216
Ana I VazquezEpidemiology & Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern genomic data sets often involve multiple data-layers (e.g., DNA-sequence, gene expression), each of which itself can be high-dimensional. The biological processes underlying these data-layers can lead to intricate multivariate association patterns. We propose and evaluate two methods to determine the proportion of variance of an output data set that can be explained by an input data set when both data panels are high dimensional. Our approach uses random-effects models to estimate the proportion of variance of vectors in the linear span of the output set that can be explained by regression on the input set. We consider a method based on an orthogonal basis (Eigen-ANOVA) and one that uses random vectors (Monte Carlo ANOVA, MC-ANOVA) in the linear span of the output set. Using simulations, we show that the MC-ANOVA method gave nearly unbiased estimates. Estimates produced by Eigen-ANOVA were also nearly unbiased, except when the shared variance was very high (e.g., >0.9). We demonstrate the potential insight that can be obtained from the use of MC-ANOVA and Eigen-ANOVA by applying these two methods to the study of multi-locus linkage disequilibrium in chicken (Gallus gallus) genomes and to the assessment of inter-dependencies between gene expression, methylation, and copy-number-variants in data from breast cancer tumors from humans (Homo sapiens). Our analyses reveal that in chicken breeding populations ~50,000 evenly-spaced SNPs are enough to fully capture the span of whole-genome-sequencing genomes. In the study of multi-omic breast cancer data, we found that the span of copy-number-variants can be fully explained using either methylation or gene expression data and that roughly 74% of the variance in gene expression can be predicted from methylation data.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsChickensDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA MethylationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomicsHumansLinkage DisequilibriumMonte Carlo MethodPolymorphism, Single NucleotideWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID33315963
PMCPMC7735570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.