Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33315961›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

A functional theory of bistable perception based on dynamical circular inference.

Pantelis Leptourgos, Vincent Bouttier, Renaud Jardri, Sophie Denève

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Footstep sounds influence bistable biological motion perception.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Bistable perception, precision and neuromodulation.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Do psychedelics change beliefs?Psychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pantelis LeptourgosDepartment of Psychiatry, Connecticut Mental Health Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0801-5501
Vincent BouttierLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives & Computationnelles, ENS, INSERM U-960, PSL Research University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3299-193X
Renaud JardriLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives & Computationnelles, ENS, INSERM U-960, PSL Research University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4596-1502
Sophie DenèveLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives & Computationnelles, ENS, INSERM U-960, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When we face ambiguous images, the brain cannot commit to a single percept; instead, it switches between mutually exclusive interpretations every few seconds, a phenomenon known as bistable perception. While neuromechanistic models, e.g., adapting neural populations with lateral inhibition, may account for the dynamics of bistability, a larger question remains unresolved: how this phenomenon informs us on generic perceptual processes in less artificial contexts. Here, we propose that bistable perception is due to our prior beliefs being reverberated in the cortical hierarchy and corrupting the sensory evidence, a phenomenon known as "circular inference". Such circularity could occur in a hierarchical brain where sensory responses trigger activity in higher-level areas but are also modulated by feedback projections from these same areas. We show that in the face of ambiguous sensory stimuli, circular inference can change the dynamics of the perceptual system and turn what should be an integrator of inputs into a bistable attractor switching between two highly trusted interpretations. The model captures various aspects of bistability, including Levelt's laws and the stabilizing effects of intermittent presentation of the stimulus. Since it is related to the generic perceptual inference and belief updating mechanisms, this approach can be used to predict the tendency of individuals to form aberrant beliefs from their bistable perception behavior. Overall, we suggest that feedforward/feedback information loops in hierarchical neural networks, a phenomenon that could lead to psychotic symptoms when overly strong, could also underlie perception in nonclinical populations.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBayes TheoremBrainHumansPhotic StimulationVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID33315961
PMCPMC7769606
OpenAlexW3111713555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.