Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33315906›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Detection and treatment of mental disorders in patients with coronary heart disease (MenDis-CHD): A cross-sectional study.

Samia Peltzer, Hendrik Müller, Ursula Köstler, Frank Schulz-Nieswandt, Frank Jessen, Christian Albus, CoRe-Net study group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perceptions of Hospital Care Quality According to People Living With Multiple Long-Term Conditions: A Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Depression Following Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. The psychological consequences of living with coronary heart disease: Are patients' psychological needs served? A mixed-method study in Germany.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samia PeltzerDepartment of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9784-6413
Hendrik MüllerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Ursula KöstlerFaculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Frank Schulz-NieswandtFaculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Frank JessenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Christian AlbusDepartment of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
CoRe-Net study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental disorders (MD) are associated with an increased risk of developing coronary heart disease (CHD) and with higher CHD-related morbidity and mortality. There is a strong recommendation to routinely screen CHD patients for MDs, diagnosis, and treatment by recent guidelines. The current study aimed at mapping CHD patients' (1) state of diagnostics and, if necessary, treatment of MDs, (2) trajectories and detection rate in healthcare, and (3) the influence of MDs and its management on quality of life and patient satisfaction. The design was a cross-sectional study in three settings (two hospitals, two rehabilitation clinics, three cardiology practices). CHD patients were screened for MDs with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and, if screened-positive, examined for MDs with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I). Quality of Life (EQ-5D), Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions (PACIC), and previous routine diagnostics and treatment for MDs were examined. Descriptive statistics, Chi-squared tests, and ANOVA were used for analyses. Analyses of the data of 364 patients resulted in 33.8% positive HADS-screenings and 28.0% SCID-I diagnoses. The detection rate of correctly pre-diagnosed MDs was 49.0%. Physicians actively approached approximately thirty percent of patients on MDs; however, only 6.6% of patients underwent psychotherapy and 4.1% medication therapy through psychotherapists/psychiatrists. MD patients scored significantly lower on EQ-5D and the PACIC. The state of diagnostic and treatment of comorbid MDs in patients with CHD is insufficient. Patients showed a positive attitude towards addressing MDs and were satisfied with medical treatment, but less with MD-related advice. Physicians in secondary care need more training inadequately addressing mental comorbidity.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyCoronary DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPsychotherapyQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID33315906
PMCPMC7735609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.