ArticlePloS one2020
Envisioning a learning surveillance system for tuberculosis.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Scoping Review on Accentuating the Pragmatism in the Implication of Mobile Health (mHealth) Technology for Tuberculosis Management in India.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Exploration of spatial-temporal varying impacts on COVID-19 cumulative case in Texas using geographically weighted regression (GWR).Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Ontological Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Roll out Strategies: A Comparison of India and the United States of America.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Space-Time Cluster's Detection and Geographical Weighted Regression Analysis of COVID-19 Mortality on Texas Counties.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Access to Healthcare during COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surveillance is critical for interrupting transmission of global epidemics. Research has highlighted gaps in the surveillance for tuberculosis that range from failure to collect real-time data to lack of standardization of data for informed decision-making at different levels of the health system. Our research aims to advance conceptual and methodological foundations for the development of a learning surveillance system for Tuberculosis, that involves systematic collection, analysis, interpretation, and feedback of outcome-specific data. It would concurrently involve the health care delivery system, public health laboratory, and epidemiologists. For our study, we systemically framed the cyber environment of TB surveillance as an ontology of the learning surveillance system. We validated the ontology by binary coding of dimensions and elements of the ontology with the metadata from an existing surveillance platform-GPMS TB Transportal. Results show GPMS TB Transportal collects a critical range of data for active case investigation and presumptive case screening for identifying and detecting confirmed TB cases. It is therefore targeted at assisting the Active Case Finding program. Building on the results, we demonstrate enhanced surveillance strategies for GPMS that are enumerated as pathways in the ontology. Our analysis reveals the scope for embedding learning surveillance pathways for digital applications in Direct Benefit Transfer, and Drug Resistance Treatment in National TB Elimination Programme in India. We discuss the possibilities of developing the transportal into a multi-level computer-aided decision support system for TB, using the innumerable pathways encapsulated in the ontology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.