Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33315888›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

A mathematical model of local and global attention in natural scene viewing.

Noa Malem-Shinitski, Manfred Opper, Sebastian Reich, Lisa Schwetlick, Stefan A Seelig, Ralf Engbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Noa Malem-ShinitskiInstitute of Mathematics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4848-4556
Manfred OpperDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2856-7589
Sebastian ReichInstitute of Mathematics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5336-8904
Lisa SchwetlickDepartment of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3356-8324
Stefan A SeeligDepartment of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1255-3078
Ralf EngbertDepartment of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2909-5811

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the decision process underlying gaze control is an important question in cognitive neuroscience with applications in diverse fields ranging from psychology to computer vision. The decision for choosing an upcoming saccade target can be framed as a selection process between two states: Should the observer further inspect the information near the current gaze position (local attention) or continue with exploration of other patches of the given scene (global attention)? Here we propose and investigate a mathematical model motivated by switching between these two attentional states during scene viewing. The model is derived from a minimal set of assumptions that generates realistic eye movement behavior. We implemented a Bayesian approach for model parameter inference based on the model's likelihood function. In order to simplify the inference, we applied data augmentation methods that allowed the use of conjugate priors and the construction of an efficient Gibbs sampler. This approach turned out to be numerically efficient and permitted fitting interindividual differences in saccade statistics. Thus, the main contribution of our modeling approach is two-fold; first, we propose a new model for saccade generation in scene viewing. Second, we demonstrate the use of novel methods from Bayesian inference in the field of scan path modeling.

Indexed as

AttentionEye MovementsFixation, OcularBayes TheoremHumansLikelihood FunctionsModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID33315888
PMCPMC7769622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.