ArticlePloS one2020
Demonstration of a fast and easy sample-to-answer protocol for tuberculosis screening in point-of-care settings: A proof of concept study.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Validation of the performance of a point of care molecular test for leprosy: From a simplified DNA extraction protocol to a portable qPCR.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Detection of Mtb and NTM: preclinical validation of a new asymmetric PCR-binary deoxyribozyme sensor assay.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Article
- Taking a step back from testing: Preanalytical considerations in molecular infectious disease diagnostics.Clinical biochemistry · 2023Review
- Editorial: New strategies and technologies enabling point of care diagnosis of neglected or tropical diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We sought to develop a smooth and low cost sample preparation and DNA extraction protocol, streamlined with a ready-to-use qPCR in a portable instrument to overcome some of the existing hurdles. Several solutions were evaluated as to their ability to liquefy a mucin-based matrix. Each liquefied matrix, supplemented with either Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) H37Rv strain DNA or intact cells, was aliquoted onto a filter paper embedded with solubilizing agents, and was subsequently dried up. Most of the nucleic acids, including genomic DNA from the bacilli and the host, binds to the filter paper. Next, several protocols were evaluated to elute the DNA from the paper, using qPCR to detect the insertion sequence IS6110, a M. tuberculosis complex genomic marker. The limit of detection (LOD) of the best protocol was then evaluated using parallel seeding and colony counting. The protocol was also evaluated using seventeen sputum samples, previously characterized by the GeneXpert or culture. Two instruments (the ABI7500 Standard and the Q3-Plus system) and two reagents storage formats (frozen or ready-to-use) were evaluated. Solutions containing guanidine isothiocyanate exerted the best liquefying effect on the mucin-based matrix extracted from one 6-mm punches, followed by a brief incubation at 95°C. The resulting DNA contained impurities, but a simple 1:10 dilution elicited the detection of MTB and human genomic targets. The described protocol presented an apparent LOD of 02 CFU/mL of MTB. Challenging the protocol with previously characterized samples showed substantial agreement with GeneXpert MTB/RIF results (sensitivity of 90%, agreement of 88.9%, kappa coefficient of 0.77), and moderate agreement with culture results (sensitivity of 100%, agreement of 78.9%, kappa coefficient of 0.58). This work presents a sensitive proof-of-concept protocol for sputum liquefaction and decontamination followed by a simple DNA extraction procedure, in which the extraction steps are streamlined with a ready-to-use qPCR in a portable instrument that can be employed in low infrastructure settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.