Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33315578›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2021

How Health Care Workers Wield Influence Through Twitter Hashtags: Retrospective Cross-sectional Study of the Gun Violence and COVID-19 Public Health Crises.

Ayotomiwa Ojo, Sharath Chandra Guntuku, Margaret Zheng, Rinad S Beidas, Megan L Ranney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Surveillance of Gun-Related Conversations on Twitter.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ayotomiwa Ojo *Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0718-838X
Sharath Chandra Guntuku *Penn Medicine Center for Digital Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2929-0035
Margaret ZhengLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5792-4536
Rinad S BeidasDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6056-6071
Megan L RanneyBrown-Lifespan Center for Digital Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8450-9642

Funding

Building Research Capacity for Firearm Safety Among ChildrenR24HD087149 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CUNNINGHAM, REBECCA M., ZIMMERMAN, MARC A · 2017 to 2021
$4.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD087149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwitter has emerged as a novel way for physicians to share ideas and advocate for policy change. #ThisIsOurLane (firearm injury) and #GetUsPPE (COVID-19) are examples of nationwide health care-led Twitter campaigns that went viral. Health care-initiated Twitter hashtags regarding major public health topics have gained national attention, but their content has not been systematically examined.

objectiveWe hypothesized that Twitter discourse on two epidemics (firearm injury and COVID-19) would differ between tweets with health care-initiated hashtags (#ThisIsOurLane and #GetUsPPE) versus those with non-health care-initiated hashtags (#GunViolence and #COVID19).

methodsUsing natural language processing, we compared content, affect, and authorship of a random 1% of tweets using #ThisIsOurLane (Nov 2018-Oct 2019) and #GetUsPPE (March-May 2020), compared to #GunViolence and #COVID19 tweets, respectively. We extracted the relative frequency of single words and phrases and created two sets of features: (1) an open-vocabulary feature set to create 50 data-driven-determined word clusters to evaluate the content of tweets; and (2) a closed-vocabulary feature for psycholinguistic categorization among case and comparator tweets. In accordance with conventional linguistic analysis, we used a P<.001, after adjusting for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction, to identify potentially meaningful correlations between language features and outcomes.

resultsIn total, 67% (n=4828) of #ThisIsOurLane tweets and 36.6% (n=7907) of #GetUsPPE tweets were authored by health care professionals, compared to 16% (n=1152) of #GunViolence and 9.8% (n=2117) of #COVID19 tweets. Tweets using #ThisIsOurLane and #GetUsPPE were more likely to contain health care-specific language; more language denoting positive emotions, affiliation, and group identity; and more action-oriented content compared to tweets with #GunViolence or #COVID19, respectively.

conclusionsTweets with health care-led hashtags expressed more positivity and more action-oriented language than the comparison hashtags. As social media is increasingly used for news discourse, public education, and grassroots organizing, the public health community can take advantage of social media's broad reach to amplify truthful, actionable messages around public health issues.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesGun ViolenceHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSocial MediacampaignCOVID-19crisisfirearm injuryhealth care workerinfluenceinfodemiologyinfoveillanceonline advocacypolicypublic healthsocial mediatweetTwitter

Identifiers

PMID33315578
PMCPMC7790125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.