Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33315353›Full record

SynthesisTurkish journal of medical sciences2021

Is cervical swab an efficient method for developing a new noninvasive prenatal diagnostic test for numerical and structural chromosome anomalies?

Erkan Yurtcu, Deniz Karçaaltıncaba, Hasan Hüseyin Kazan, Halis Özdemir, Meral Yirmibeş Karaoğuz, Pinar Çalış, Gülsüm Kayhan, Sezen Güntekin Ergün, Ferda Perçin, Merih Bayram and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Erkan YurtcuDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University,Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-4930-8164
Deniz KarçaaltıncabaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-5276-9303
Hasan Hüseyin KazanDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-7936-8606
Halis ÖzdemirDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-9194-8504
Meral Yirmibeş KaraoğuzDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-0178-8018
Pinar ÇalışDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sami Ulus Women’s and Children’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-9334-1987
Gülsüm KayhanDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-4286-243X
Sezen Güntekin ErgünDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-7133-5049
Ferda PerçinDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-9317-8155
Merih BayramDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-1299-2433
Mustafa Necmi İlhanDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-1367-6328
Gamze BilgiliDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University,Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-4233-2738
Tuğrul KaymakMycotoxin Analysis Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-5880-8211
Mehmet Ali ErgünDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-9696-0433
Gazi University · TRBaşkent University · TRDr Sami Ulus Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRHacettepe University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: Prenatal diagnosis is vital to obtain healthy generation for risky pregnancies. There have been several approaches, some of which are routinely applied in clinics to evaluate the possible prenatal deficiencies and/or diseases. In the present study, we aimed to isolate the fetal cells from endocervical samples and try to identify possible anomalies which were proved by Amniocentesis (AS) and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) methods. Materials and methods: Endoservical specimens were collected from 100 pregnant women. Cells were separated in parallel by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) using human leukocyte antigen (HLA) G233 and placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP) antibodies. CMA (comprehensive meta-analysis) were carried out and male fetuses were confirmed with Sex determining region Y (SRY) amplification. Results: The percent of HLA G233 and placental and placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP) positive cells were 4.55% and 84.59%, respectively. The percent of cells positive for both markers was 14.75%. CMA analyses were not informative. (SRY) was amplified in 67% of the samples. Conclusion: However, the success rate of the both cell sorting and scanning of DNA anomalies by aCGH and/or RT-PCR was limited, preventing the applicability of this proposal in the clinics. Still, the success of the proposed method depends on the development of the novel fetal cell-specific antibodies and the improvements in the sorting systems.

Indexed as

Alkaline PhosphataseDiagnostic Tests, RoutineChromosome AberrationsChromosomesFemaleHumansMalePlacentaPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisAlkaline PhosphataseCervical swabCMA (comprehensive meta-analysis)fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS)

Identifiers

PMID33315353
PMCPMC8283453
OpenAlexW3116310233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.