Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33315215›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Disclosing Allostery Through Protein Contact Networks.

Luisa Di Paola, Giampiero Mei, Almerinda Di Venere, Alessandro Giuliani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luisa Di PaolaUnit of Chemical-Physics Fundamentals in Chemical Engineering, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Rome, Rome, Italy. l.dipaola@unicampus.it.
Giampiero MeiDepartment of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Almerinda Di VenereDepartment of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Alessandro GiulianiEnvironment and Health Department, Instituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are located in the twilight zone between chemistry and biology, where a peculiar kind of complexity starts. Proteins are the smallest 'devices' showing a sensible adaptation to their environment by the production of appropriate behavior when facing a specific stimulus. This fact qualifies (from the 'effector' side) proteins as nanomachines working as catalysts, motors, or switches. However (from the sensor side), the need to single out the 'specific stimulus' out of thermal noise qualifies proteins as information processing devices. Allostery corresponds to the modification of the configuration (in a broad sense) of the protein molecule in response to a specific stimulus in a non-strictly local way, thereby connecting the sensor and effector sides of the nanomachine. This is why the 'disclosing' of allostery phenomenon is at the very heart of protein function; in this chapter, we will demonstrate how a network-based representation of protein structure in terms of nodes (aminoacid residues) and edges (effective contacts between residues) is the natural language for getting rid of allosteric phenomena and, more in general, of protein structure/function relationships.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationDatabases, ProteinModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProtein Interaction MapsProteinsSoftwareProteinsNetwork descriptorsProtein contact networksSpectral clustering

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.