Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33315178›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2020

Automated quantification of baseline imaging PET metrics on FDG PET/CT images of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma patients.

Amy J Weisman, Jihyun Kim, Inki Lee, Kathleen M McCarten, Sandy Kessel, Cindy L Schwartz, Kara M Kelly, Robert Jeraj, Steve Y Cho, Tyler J Bradshaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Predictive value of maximum tumor dissemination (Dmax) in lymphoma patients treated with CD19-specific CAR T-Cells.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Semiquantitative 2-[Frontiers in medicine · 2024
    Review
  14. Sensitivity of an AI method for [EJNMMI research · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cancers · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amy J WeismanDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Jihyun KimDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Inki LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine Korea Cancer Centre Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea.
Kathleen M McCartenIROC-Rhode Island, Lincoln, RI, USA.
Sandy KesselIROC-Rhode Island, Lincoln, RI, USA.
Cindy L SchwartzMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Kara M KellyDepartment of Pediatrics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Robert JerajDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Steve Y ChoDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Tyler J BradshawDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. tbradshaw@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9549-7002

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
IROC: Enhancing local enrolling site radiological data capture capabilities for NCTN trialsU24CA180803 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI Thomas J. FitzGerald, MICHAEL V KNOPP · 2014 to 2026
$116.2M
Children's Oncology Group Statistics &Data Center GrantU10CA098413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDERSON, JAMES R · 2003 to 2013
$67.5M
QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW CENTER (QARC)U10CA029511 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI FITZGERALD, THOMAS J. · 1985 to 2013
$23.4M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA029511NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098413NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180803NIH HHS CA29511NIH HHS U10CA098413NIH HHS U10CA180886NIH HHS U10CA180899NIH HHS U24CA180803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFor pediatric lymphoma, quantitative FDG PET/CT imaging features such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) are important for prognosis and risk stratification strategies. However, feature extraction is difficult and time-consuming in cases of high disease burden. The purpose of this study was to fully automate the measurement of PET imaging features in PET/CT images of pediatric lymphoma.

methods

resultsMedian Dice similarity coefficient of patient contours between automated and physician contours was 0.86 (IQR 0.78-0.91). Automated SUV

conclusionsAn automated method using an ensemble of multi-resolution pathway 3D CNNs was able to quantify PET imaging features of lymphoma on baseline FDG PET/CT images with excellent agreement to reference physician PET segmentation. Automated methods with faster throughput for PET quantitation, such as MTV and TLG, show promise in more accessible clinical and research applications.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networksImaging biomarkersPediatric lymphomaPET

Identifiers

PMID33315178
PMCPMC7736382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.