Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33315125›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2021

Methadone-mediated sensitization of glioblastoma cells is drug and cell line dependent.

Bodo Haas, Janine Ciftcioglu, Sanja Jermar, Sandra Weickhardt, Niels Eckstein, Bernd Kaina

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bodo HaasFederal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Germany. bodo.haas@bfarm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1213-3527
Janine CiftciogluFederal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Germany.
Sanja JermarFederal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Germany.
Sandra WeickhardtFederal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Germany.
Niels EcksteinApplied Pharmacy, University of Applied Sciences Kaiserslautern, Campus Pirmasens, Carl-Schurz-Str. 10-16, 66953, Pirmasens, Germany.
Bernd KainaInstitute of Toxicology, University Medical Center, Obere Zahlbacher Strasse 67, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices · DETH Köln - University of Applied Sciences · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Applied Sciences Kaiserslautern · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeD,L-methadone (MET), an analgesic drug used for pain treatment and opiate addiction, has achieved attention from oncologists and social media as possible chemoensitizing agent in cancer therapy, notably brain cancer (glioblastoma multiforme, GBM). MET has been reported to enhance doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity in GBM cells via activation of the µ-opioid receptor (MOR). Here, we extended this work and quantified the toxic effect of MET in comparison to other opioids alone and in combination with doxorubicin and the clinically more relevant alkylating drug temozolomide (TMZ), using a set of GBM cell lines and primary GBM cells.

methodsMOR expression in GBM cells was investigated by immunofluorescence and immunoblotting. Resistance to drugs alone and in combination with anticancer drugs was assessed by MTT assays. Concentration effect curves were fitted by nonlinear regression analysis and IC

resultsMET alone was cytotoxic in all GBM cell lines and primary GBM cells at high micromolar concentrations (IC

conclusionMET was found to be cytotoxic in GBM cells in vitro only at high, clinically not relevant concentrations, where it was effective in inducing apoptosis and necrosis. Sensitizing effects were only observed in combination with doxorubicin, but not with TMZ, and are dependent on cell line and the applied drug concentration. Therefore, our findings do not support the use of MET in the treatment of GBM in combination with TMZ, as no sensitizing effect of MET was observed.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDoxorubicinDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorDrug SynergismGlioblastomaHumansMethadoneMorphineNaloxoneOxycodoneReceptors, Opioid, muTumor Cells, CulturedAnalgesics, OpioidDoxorubicinMethadoneMorphineNaloxoneOxycodoneReceptors, Opioid, muApoptosisChemosensitizerDoxorubicinGlioblastomaMethadoneTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID33315125
PMCPMC7872955
OpenAlexW3111049084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.