ArticleJAMA network open2020
Assessment of Time-to-Treatment Initiation and Survival in a Cohort of Patients With Common Cancers.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
122 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 198 citations in OpenAlex.
- Built environment (BE) and cancer: a systematic review of the BE's impact during the treatment journey and patient outcomes.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Pooled it
- Supernatant from endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration samples for molecular profiling in NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Pooled it
- Colorectal cancer treatment in people with severe mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2022Pooled it
- The patient, diagnostic, and treatment intervals in adult patients with cancer from high- and lower-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Trends, Disparities, and Outcomes in Time to Treatment Initiation in Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Timeliness of Colorectal Cancer Care in Veterans: The Role of Travel Distance.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Challenges to treatment preparedness among lung cancer patients from a healthcare provider perspective: a mixed-method study.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Role prompting modulates linguistic style but not clinical decision structure in GPT-5 tumour board simulation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Combined Association of Time to Treatment, Guideline Concordance, and Neighborhood Vulnerability with Localized Colon Cancer, Non-small-cell Lung Cancer, and Pancreatic Cancer Survival.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Early first-line systemic anticancer therapeutic attrition after metastatic recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy: a multicenter real-world study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Mapping Physical Fitness Assessments in Interventional Research Among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Later-Stage Diagnosis and Poorer Survival in Pancreatic Cancer Patients With Vague Symptoms: A Population-Based Study.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Article
- Time to Treatment Initiation Analysis in Patients with Localized Extremity Non-Small Round Cell Sarcoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- Disparities in Disease Presentation and Treatment Initiation for De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- State Medigap Policies and Disenrollment From Medicare Advantage Among Beneficiaries With Cancer.JCO oncology practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Re-evaluating the access imperative in healthcare in the United States.Journal of public health policy · 2026Review
- Access Improvement in Healthcare: Be Quick, but Don't Hurry?Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Treatment Delays and Survival Divides: Race, Sex, and Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Disparities.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Prevalence and determinants of late time to treatment initiation among colorectal cancer patients in the Amhara Region, Ethiopia.The Pan African medical journal · 2026Article
62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Resource limitations because of pandemic or other stresses on infrastructure necessitate the triage of time-sensitive care, including cancer treatments. Optimal time to treatment is underexplored, so recommendations for which cancer treatments can be deferred are often based on expert opinion. Objective: To evaluate the association between increased time to definitive therapy and mortality as a function of cancer type and stage for the 4 most prevalent cancers in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study assessed treatment and outcome information from patients with nonmetastatic breast, prostate, non-small cell lung (NSCLC), and colon cancers from 2004 to 2015, with data analyzed January to March 2020. Data on outcomes associated with appropriate curative-intent surgical, radiation, or medical therapy were gathered from the National Cancer Database. Exposures: Time-to-treatment initiation (TTI), the interval between diagnosis and therapy, using intervals of 8 to 60, 61 to 120, 121 to 180, and greater than 180 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: 5-year and 10-year predicted all-cause mortality. Results: This study included 2 241 706 patients (mean [SD] age 63 [11.9] years, 1 268 794 [56.6%] women, 1 880 317 [83.9%] White): 1 165 585 (52.0%) with breast cancer, 853 030 (38.1%) with prostate cancer, 130 597 (5.8%) with NSCLC, and 92 494 (4.1%) with colon cancer. Median (interquartile range) TTI by cancer was 32 (21-48) days for breast, 79 (55-117) days for prostate, 41 (27-62) days for NSCLC, and 26 (16-40) days for colon. Across all cancers, a general increase in the 5-year and 10-year predicted mortality was associated with increasing TTI. The most pronounced mortality association was for colon cancer (eg, 5 y predicted mortality, stage III: TTI 61-120 d, 38.9% vs. 181-365 d, 47.8%), followed by stage I NSCLC (5 y predicted mortality: TTI 61-120 d, 47.4% vs 181-365 d, 47.6%), while survival for prostate cancer was least associated (eg, 5 y predicted mortality, high risk: TTI 61-120 d, 12.8% vs 181-365 d, 14.1%), followed by breast cancer (eg, 5 y predicted mortality, stage I: TTI 61-120 d, 11.0% vs. 181-365 d, 15.2%). A nonsignificant difference in treatment delays and worsened survival was observed for stage II lung cancer patients-who had the highest all-cause mortality for any TTI regardless of treatment timing. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, for all studied cancers there was evidence that shorter TTI was associated with lower mortality, suggesting an indirect association between treatment deferral and mortality that may not become evident for years. In contrast to current pandemic-related guidelines, these findings support more timely definitive treatment for intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.