Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33315115›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Assessment of Time-to-Treatment Initiation and Survival in a Cohort of Patients With Common Cancers.

Eugene B Cone, Maya Marchese, Marco Paciotti, David-Dan Nguyen, Junaid Nabi, Alexander P Cole, George Molina, Rose L Molina, Christina A Minami, Lorelei A Mucci and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trends, Disparities, and Outcomes in Time to Treatment Initiation in Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Eugene B ConeDivision of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Maya MarcheseDivision of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Marco PaciottiDivision of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
David-Dan NguyenDivision of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Junaid NabiDivision of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alexander P ColeDivision of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
George MolinaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rose L MolinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christina A MinamiDivision of Breast Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lorelei A MucciDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Adam S KibelDivision of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Quoc-Dien TrinhDivision of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USHarvard University · USHumanitas University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Resource limitations because of pandemic or other stresses on infrastructure necessitate the triage of time-sensitive care, including cancer treatments. Optimal time to treatment is underexplored, so recommendations for which cancer treatments can be deferred are often based on expert opinion. Objective: To evaluate the association between increased time to definitive therapy and mortality as a function of cancer type and stage for the 4 most prevalent cancers in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study assessed treatment and outcome information from patients with nonmetastatic breast, prostate, non-small cell lung (NSCLC), and colon cancers from 2004 to 2015, with data analyzed January to March 2020. Data on outcomes associated with appropriate curative-intent surgical, radiation, or medical therapy were gathered from the National Cancer Database. Exposures: Time-to-treatment initiation (TTI), the interval between diagnosis and therapy, using intervals of 8 to 60, 61 to 120, 121 to 180, and greater than 180 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: 5-year and 10-year predicted all-cause mortality. Results: This study included 2 241 706 patients (mean [SD] age 63 [11.9] years, 1 268 794 [56.6%] women, 1 880 317 [83.9%] White): 1 165 585 (52.0%) with breast cancer, 853 030 (38.1%) with prostate cancer, 130 597 (5.8%) with NSCLC, and 92 494 (4.1%) with colon cancer. Median (interquartile range) TTI by cancer was 32 (21-48) days for breast, 79 (55-117) days for prostate, 41 (27-62) days for NSCLC, and 26 (16-40) days for colon. Across all cancers, a general increase in the 5-year and 10-year predicted mortality was associated with increasing TTI. The most pronounced mortality association was for colon cancer (eg, 5 y predicted mortality, stage III: TTI 61-120 d, 38.9% vs. 181-365 d, 47.8%), followed by stage I NSCLC (5 y predicted mortality: TTI 61-120 d, 47.4% vs 181-365 d, 47.6%), while survival for prostate cancer was least associated (eg, 5 y predicted mortality, high risk: TTI 61-120 d, 12.8% vs 181-365 d, 14.1%), followed by breast cancer (eg, 5 y predicted mortality, stage I: TTI 61-120 d, 11.0% vs. 181-365 d, 15.2%). A nonsignificant difference in treatment delays and worsened survival was observed for stage II lung cancer patients-who had the highest all-cause mortality for any TTI regardless of treatment timing. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, for all studied cancers there was evidence that shorter TTI was associated with lower mortality, suggesting an indirect association between treatment deferral and mortality that may not become evident for years. In contrast to current pandemic-related guidelines, these findings support more timely definitive treatment for intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsColonic NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsTime-to-TreatmentAgedCohort StudiesCOVID-19Databases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMortalityNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID33315115
PMCPMC7737088
OpenAlexW3112385711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.