ArticleJAMA network open2020
Comparison of 2 Triage Scoring Guidelines for Allocation of Mechanical Ventilators.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prone Positioning in a North American Cohort of Hypoxemic Patients on Mechanical Ventilation.Critical care medicine · 2026Observational
- Simulating crisis triage: a methodological framework for evaluating ventilator allocation under crisis standards of care.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Prone Positioning in a North American Cohort of Hypoxemic Patients on Mechanical Ventilation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Challenges of Ventilator Procurement and Distribution in the ICU During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.Critical care explorations · 2025Article
- COVID-19 critical care triage across Canada: a narrative synthesis and ethical analysis of early provincial triage protocols.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024Article
- Prognosticating the outcome of intensive care in older patients-a narrative review.Annals of intensive care · 2024Review
- Investigating Ethical Tradeoffs in Crisis Standards of Care through Simulation of Ventilator Allocation Protocols.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Investigating ethical tradeoffs in crisis standards of care through simulation of ventilator allocation protocols.PloS one · 2024Article
- Limiting life-sustaining treatment for very old ICU patients: cultural challenges and diverse practices.Annals of intensive care · 2023Article
- Simulation of New York City's Ventilator Allocation Guideline During the Spring 2020 COVID-19 Surge.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Exploring the clinical benefit of ventilation therapy across various patient groups with COVID-19 using real-world data.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The role of clinical phenotypes in decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for very old patients in the ICU.Annals of intensive care · 2023Article
- Serial SOFA-score trends in ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients as predictor of 28-day mortality: A prospective cohort study.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Clustering analysis of geriatric and acute characteristics in a cohort of very old patients on admission to ICU.Intensive care medicine · 2022Article
- How Common SOFA and Ventilator Time Trial Criteria Would Have Performed During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational Simulated Cohort Study.Disaster medicine and public health preparedness · 2022Observational
- Predictive Value of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score across Patients with and without COVID-19 Infection.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2022Article
- Hippocrates and prophecies: the unfulfilled promise of prediction rules.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2022Article
- Assessment of a Crisis Standards of Care Scoring System for Resource Prioritization and Estimated Excess Mortality by Race, Ethnicity, and Socially Vulnerable Area During a Regional Surge in COVID-19.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Simulation of Ventilator Allocation in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021Article
- Performance of crisis standards of care guidelines in a cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients in the United States.Cell reports. Medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: In the current setting of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, there is concern for the possible need for triage criteria for ventilator allocation; to our knowledge, the implications of using specific criteria have never been assessed. Objective: To determine which and how many admissions to intensive care units are identified as having the lowest priority for ventilator allocation using 2 distinct sets of proposed triage criteria. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study conducted in spring 2020 used data collected from US hospitals and reported in the Philips eICU Collaborative Research Database. Adult admissions (N = 40 439) to 291 intensive care units from 2014 to 2015 who received mechanical ventilation and were not elective surgery patients were included. Exposures: New York State triage criteria and original triage criteria proposed by White and Lo. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were calculated for admissions. The proportion of patients who met initial criteria for the lowest level of priority for mechanical ventilation using each set of criteria and their characteristics and outcomes were assessed. Agreement was compared between the 2 sets of triage criteria, recognizing differences in stated criteria aims. Results: Among 40 439 intensive care unit admissions of patients who received mechanical ventilation, the mean (SD) age was 62.6 (16.6) years, 54.9% were male, and the mean (SD) SOFA score was 4.5 (3.7). Using the New York State triage criteria, 8.9% (95% CI, 8.7%-9.2%) were in the lowest priority category; these lowest priority admissions had a mean (SD) age of 62.9 (16.6) years, used a median (interquartile range) of 57.3 (20.1-133.5) ventilator hours each, and had a hospital survival rate of 38.6% (95% CI, 37.0%-40.2%). Using the White and Lo triage criteria, 4.3% (95% CI, 4.1%-4.5%) were in the lowest priority category; these admissions had a mean (SD) age of 68.6 (13.2) years, used a median (interquartile range) of 61.7 (24.3-142.8) ventilator hours each, and had a hospital survival rate of 56.2% (95% CI, 53.8%-58.7%). Only 655 admissions (1.6%) were in the lowest priority category for both guidelines, with the κ statistic for agreement equal to 0.20 (95% CI, 0.18-0.21). Conclusions and Relevance: Use of 2 initially proposed ventilator triage guidelines identified approximately 1 in every 10 to 25 admissions as having the lowest priority for ventilator allocation, with little agreement. Clinical assessment of different potential criteria for triage decisions in critically ill populations is important to ensure valid and equitable allocation of resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.