ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2021
Using a Twitter Chat to Rapidly Identify Barriers and Policy Solutions for Metastatic Breast Cancer Care: Qualitative Study.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Social Media Listening to Understand the Lived Experience of Individuals in Europe With Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Search and Content Analysis Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Mapping Characteristics, Applications, and Implementation Challenges of Virtual Communities in Cancer Care: NASSS Framework-Informed Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Best practices for the collection and analysis of patient experience data from social media for patient-focused drug development.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Social media for radiologists: opportunities and challenges.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Financial burden among metastatic breast cancer patients: a qualitative inquiry of costs, financial assistance, health insurance, and financial coping behaviors.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Impact of NDUFAF6 on breast cancer prognosis: linking mitochondrial regulation to immune response and PD-L1 expression.Cancer cell international · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence-enabled social media listening to inform early patient-focused drug development: perspectives on approaches and strategies.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Patient listening on social media for patient-focused drug development: a synthesis of considerations from patients, industry and regulators.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Rapid methods for identifying barriers and solutions to improve access to community health services: a scoping review.BJGP open · 2023Article
- Re-imagining metastatic breast cancer care delivery: a patient-partnered qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Use of Social Media for Health Advocacy for Digital Communities: Descriptive Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Metastatic Breast Cancer in Young Women: Systematic Assessment.JMIR cancer · 2023Article
- How Participatory Health Informatics Catalyzes One Digital Health.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023Article
- A Qualitative Study of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Metastatic Breast Cancer Care.Journal of patient experience · 2023Article
- Impact of #PsychTwitter in promoting global psychiatry: A hashtag analysis study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Article
- The Experiences of Stakeholders Using Social Media as a Tool for Health Service Design and Quality Improvement: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- #COVID19 and #Breastcancer: A Qualitative Analysis of Tweets.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- The Rise of the Expert Patient in Cancer: From Backseat Passenger to Co-navigator.JCO oncology practice · 2022Review
- Exploring access to care from the perspective of patients with breast cancer: A qualitative study.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReal-time, rapid assessment of barriers to care experienced by patients can be used to inform relevant health care legislation. In recent years, online communities have become a source of support for patients as well as a vehicle for discussion and collaboration among patients, clinicians, advocates, and researchers. The Breast Cancer Social Media (#BCSM) community has hosted weekly Twitter chats since 2011. Topics vary each week, and chats draw a diverse group of participants. Partnering with the #BCSM community, we used Twitter to gather data on barriers to care for patients with metastatic breast cancer and potential policy solutions. Metastatic breast cancer survival rates are low and in large part conditioned by time-sensitive access to care factors that might be improved through policy changes.
objectiveThis study was part of an assessment of the barriers to care for metastatic breast cancer with the goal of offering policy solutions for the legislative session in California.
methodsWe provided 5 questions for a chat specific to metastatic breast cancer care barriers and potential policy solutions. These were discussed during the course of a #BCSM chat on November 18, 2019. We used Symplur (Symplur LLC) analytics to generate a transcript of tweets and a profile of participants. Responses to the questions are presented in this paper.
resultsThere were 288 tweets from 42 users, generating 2.1 million impressions during the 1-hour chat. Participants included 23 patient advocates (most of whom were patients themselves), 7 doctors, 6 researchers or academics, 3 health care providers (2 nurses, 1 clinical psychologist), and 2 advocacy organizations. Participants noted communication gaps between patient and provider especially as related to the need for individualized medication dosing to minimize side effects and maximize quality of life. Timeliness of insurance company response, for example, to authorize treatments, was also a concern. Chat participants noted that palliative care is not well integrated into metastatic breast cancer care and that insurance company denials of coverage for these services were common. Regarding financial challenges, chat participants mentioned unexpected copays, changes in insurance drug formularies that made it difficult to anticipate drug costs, and limits on the number of physical therapy visits covered by insurance. Last, on the topic of disability benefits, participants expressed frustration about how to access disability benefits. When prompted for input regarding what health system and policy changes are necessary, participants suggested a number of ideas, including expanding the availability of nurse navigation for metastatic breast cancer, developing and offering a guide for the range of treatment and support resources patients with metastatic breast cancer, and improving access to clinical trials.
conclusionsRapid assessments drawing from online community insights may be a critical source of data that can be used to ensure more responsive policy action to improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.