Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33314768›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2021

The efficacy of polyether-ether-ketone wire as a retainer following orthodontic treatment.

Ammar Salim Kadhum, Akram Faisal Alhuwaizi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of six different CAD/CAM retainers vs. the stainless steel twistflex retainer: an in vitro investigation of survival rate and stability.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ammar Salim KadhumOrthodontic Department, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0003-0851-560X
Akram Faisal AlhuwaiziOrthodontic Department, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
University of Baghdad · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the efficacy of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) wire as a fixed orthodontic retainer, by comparing its performance to other retainer wires and optimizing its adhesion to composite bonding materials. MATERIALS AND

methodsRetainer wires of 15 mm segments were used, PEEK wires were prepared in cylindrical form with 0.8 mm diameter, and had two surface treatments namely air-abrasion and conditioning with adhesive system. Three different metallic retainer wires were used for comparison and three tests were performed; two tests measured debonding force and associated wire deflection from acrylic blocks and bovine teeth and one test for pull-out force. To test debonding force, a vertically directed compressive force was applied to the retainer wires bonded to the acrylic blocks and bovine teeth, while for pull-out test; a vertically directed tensile force detached the retainer wire.

resultsIn both debonding tests, PEEK wires (regardless the surface treatment) had non-significant difference when compared to each other, or to the other metallic wires, except the dead-soft coaxial wire group. The dead-soft coaxial wire group had significant difference when compared to other groups regarding both the force magnitude and maximum deflection, the only exception was the debonding force of the flat braided retainer wires bonded to bovine teeth. In pull-out test PEEK wires conditioned with adhesive system and the air-abraded recorded the second and third highest readings respectively.

conclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, the 0.8 mm round PEEK wires have comparable performance-in terms of debonding and pull out forces-to conventional retainers when bonded with 4 mm composite bonding spots; using air-abrasion for 10 s at 3.5 MPa provided sufficient adhesion of the composite to the wire, and conditioning with adhesive system may provide no further clinical benefit.

Indexed as

Dental BondingOrthodontic WiresAnimalsBenzophenonesCattleEthersHumansKetonesOrthodontic Appliance DesignPolymersBenzophenonesEthersKetonespolyetheretherketonePolymersPEEKRetainerRetention

Identifiers

PMID33314768
PMCPMC8204027
OpenAlexW3113142772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.