Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33314605›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2021

Prevention of pressure injury in the operating room: Heels operating room pressure injury trial.

Thaís Dresch Eberhardt, Suzinara Beatriz Soares de Lima, Rhea Silvia de Avila Soares, Lidiana Batista Teixeira Dutra Silveira, Bruna Rossarola Pozzebon, Cassia Ribeiro Reis, Karla Priscilla Paulino Dos Santos, Paulo Jorge Pereira Alves

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dressings and topical agents for preventing pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thaís Dresch EberhardtDepartamento de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0138-2066
Suzinara Beatriz Soares de LimaDepartamento de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2162-8601
Rhea Silvia de Avila SoaresColégio Politécnico, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8726-2377
Lidiana Batista Teixeira Dutra SilveiraDepartamento de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6373-9353
Bruna Rossarola PozzebonDepartamento de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5734-5355
Cassia Ribeiro ReisDepartamento de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9182-0036
Karla Priscilla Paulino Dos SantosDepartamento de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4496-6347
Paulo Jorge Pereira AlvesInstituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6348-3316
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria · BRUniversidade Católica Portuguesa · PTUniversidade de Passo Fundo · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do SulHospital Universitário de Santa MariaMölnlycke Health Care ABUniversidade Católica Portuguesa / Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Saúde (CIIS) - FCT Financiamento Base UIDB 04279/2020Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of multi-layered silicone foam (intervention) compared with transparent polyurethane film (control) in preventing heel pressure injuries caused by surgical positioning of individuals undergoing elective surgery. It was designed an intra-patient, open, parallel, randomised controlled trial was conducted in a university hospital in southern Brazil, from March 2019 to February 2020, with patients undergoing elective surgeries of cardiac and gastrointestinal specialties. The patients who met the selection criteria constituted, simultaneously, a single group receiving the intervention and active control, through paired analysis of the cutaneous sites (right heel and left heel). The outcome was the occurrence of PI, within the follow-up period was 72 hours. Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials: RBR-5GKNG5. There was analysis of 135 patients/270 heels, with an overall incidence of 36.7%. The pressure injury incidence was significantly lower in the intervention group (26.7%), compared with the control group (P = .001); relative risk of 0.57. In the intervention group, the estimated pressure injury-free time (survival) was 57.5 hours and in the control group, 43.9 hours. It was concluded that Multi-layered silicone foam (intervention) is more efficacious than transparent polyurethane film (control) in the prevention of pressure injuries caused by surgical positioning of individuals undergoing elective surgery.

Indexed as

HeelPressure UlcerBandagesBrazilFemaleHumansMaleOperating Roomsbandagesheelperioperative nursingpressure ulcerrandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID33314605
PMCPMC8243998
OpenAlexW3111604545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.