Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33314565›Full record

ArticlePsychology and psychotherapy2021

Mistrust and negative self-esteem: Two paths from attachment styles to paranoia.

Anton P Martinez, Maximilian Agostini, Azzam Al-Suhibani, Richard P Bentall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology and psychotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Adverse childhood experiences, basic psychological needs, and adolescent affective distress: Revisiting the buffering role of resilience factors.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anton P MartinezDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, UK.
Maximilian AgostiniDepartment of Social and Organizational Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Azzam Al-SuhibaniDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK.
Richard P BentallDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesParanoia is known to be associated with insecure attachment, with negative self-esteem as a mediator, but this pathway is insufficient to explain the paranoid individual's beliefs about malevolent others. Mistrust is a likely additional factor as it is a core feature of paranoid thinking also associated with insecure attachment styles. In this study, we tested whether mistrust - operationalized as judgements about the trustworthiness of unfamiliar faces - constitutes a second pathway from insecure attachment to paranoia.

designThe design of the study was cross-sectional.

methodsA nationally representative British sample of 1,508 participants aged 18-86, 50.8% female, recruited through the survey company Qualtrics, completed measurements of attachment style, negative self-esteem, and paranoid beliefs. Usable data were obtained from 1,121 participants. Participants were asked to make trustworthiness judgements about computer-generated faces, and their outcomes were analysed by conducting signal detection analysis, which provided measures of bias (the tendency to assume untrustworthiness in conditions of uncertainty) and sensitivity (accuracy in distinguish between trustworthy and untrustworthy faces).

resultsResults using structural equation modelling revealed a good model fit (RMSEA = .071, 95% CI: 0.067-0.075, SRMR = .045, CFI = .93, TLI = .92). We observed indirect effects through bias towards mistrust both for the relationship between attachment anxiety and avoidance (β = .003, 95% CI: 0.001-0.005,p < .001) and attachment anxiety and paranoia (β = .003, 95% CI 0.002-0.006, p < .001). We observed an indirect effect through negative self-esteem only for the relationship between attachment anxiety and paranoia (β = .064, 95% CI: 0.053-0.077, p < .001). Trust judgements and negative self-esteem were not associated with each other.

conclusionsWe find that a bias towards mistrust is associated with greater paranoia. We also find indirect effects through bias towards mistrust between attachment styles and paranoia. Finally, we reaffirm the strong indirect effect through negative self-esteem between attachment anxiety and paranoia. Limitations of the study are discussed. PRACTITIONER POINTS: When working with individuals suffering from paranoia, clinicians should consider not only explicit, deliberative cognitive processes of the kind addressed in cognitive behaviour therapy (e.g. cognitive restructuring) but also the way in which their patients make perceptual judgements (e.g., their immediate reactions on encountering new people) and consider interventions targeted at these judgements, for example, bias modification training. Assessment and clinical interventions for people should consider the role of trust judgements and the way in which they combine with low self-esteem to provoke paranoid beliefs. Psychological interventions targeting paranoid beliefs should focus on both attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance.

Indexed as

Paranoid DisordersSelf ConceptAnxietyAnxiety DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleattachmentmistrustparanoiaresponse biasself-esteemsignal detection

Identifiers

PMID33314565
PMCPMC8451824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.