Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33314549›Full record

SynthesisThe oncologist2021

The Role of Immunotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of 2,402 Patients.

Ioannis A Ziogas, Alexandros P Evangeliou, Dimitrios Giannis, Muhammad H Hayat, Konstantinos S Mylonas, Samer Tohme, David A Geller, Nahel Elias, Lipika Goyal, Georgios Tsoulfas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05546619 (Research on Effectiveness and Safety of the Treatment, Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Combined With Tislelizumab and Targeted Therapy, That is Used for High-risk Hepatocellular Carcinoma After R0 Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05546619 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Research on Effectiveness and Safety of the Treatment, Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Combined With Tislelizumab and Targeted Therapy, That is Used for High-risk Hepatocellular Carcinoma After R0 Resection

TypeinterventionalSponsorSulai LiuRan2022 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsHepatocellular CarcinomaArmsHIPEC+tislelizumab + targeted therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Biomimetic Cell Membrane-Coated MOFs System for Targeted Cancer Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The application ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Metabolic Tumor Volume Measured byJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ioannis A Ziogas *First Department of Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6742-6909
Alexandros P Evangeliou *Medicine Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0042-9064
Dimitrios GiannisSurgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9246-976X
Muhammad H HayatDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9766-1424
Konstantinos S MylonasDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2356-6694
Samer TohmeDepartment of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8770-9706
David A GellerDepartment of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0735-1068
Nahel EliasTransplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6466-7347
Lipika Goyal *Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9777-6221
Georgios Tsoulfas *First Department of Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5043-7962
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRHarvard University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USYale New Haven Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a treatment option for several malignancies. Nivolumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab have been approved for the management of advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to systematically review the literature and summarize the characteristics and outcomes of patients with HCC treated with ICIs.

methodsA systematic literature search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed according to the PRISMA statement (end of search date: November 7, 2020). Quality of evidence assessment was also performed.

resultsSixty-three articles including 2,402 patients were analyzed, 2,376 of whom received ICIs for unresectable HCC. Response to ICIs could be evaluated in 2,116 patients; the overall objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 22.7% and 60.7%, respectively, and the mean overall survival (OS) was 15.8 months. The ORR, DCR, and OS for nivolumab (n = 846) were 19.7%, 51.1%, and 18.7 months, respectively; for pembrolizumab (n = 435) they were 20.7%, 64.6% and 13.3 months, respectively. The combination of atezolizumab/bevacizumab (n = 460) demonstrated an ORR and DCR of 30% and 77%, respectively. The overall rate of treatment discontinuation because of adverse events was 14.9%. Fifteen patients received ICIs in the liver transplant (LT) setting (one pre-LT for bridging, 14 for post-LT recurrence); fatal graft rejection was reported in 40.0% (n = 6/15) and mortality in 80.0% (n = 12/15).

conclusionICIs are safe and effective against unresectable HCC, but caution is warranted regarding their use in the LT setting because of the high graft rejection rate. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This systematic review pooled the outcomes from studies reporting on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the management of 2,402 patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 2,376 of whom had unresectable HCC. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 22.7% and 60.7%, respectively, and the mean overall survival was 15.8 months. The overall rate of treatment discontinuation because of adverse events was 14.9%. Fifteen patients received ICIs in the liver transplant (LT) setting (one pre-LT for bridging, 14 for post-LT recurrence). Six of these patients experienced graft rejection (40.0%).

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNivolumabNivolumabCTLA-4 inhibitorsHepatocellular carcinomaImmune checkpoint inhibitorsImmunotherapyPD-1 inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33314549
PMCPMC8176986
OpenAlexW3112357084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.