Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33314372›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroscience research2022

Engaging endogenous opioid circuits in pain affective processes.

Blake A Kimmey, Nora M McCall, Lisa M Wooldridge, Theodore D Satterthwaite, Gregory Corder

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroscience research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Mimicking opioid analgesia in cortical pain circuits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Convergent state-control of endogenous opioid analgesia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Interplay between the oxytocin and opioid systems in regulating social behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Translational aspects of deep brain stimulation for chronic pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Blake A KimmeyDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6559-8005
Nora M McCallDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5793-1701
Lisa M WooldridgeDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6465-1222
Theodore D SatterthwaiteDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7072-9399
Gregory CorderDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0031-0773
University of Pennsylvania · USLifespan · US

Funding

Harnessing cortical neuromodulation to disrupt pain perceptionDP2GM140923 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CORDER, GREGORY · 2020 to 2022
$2.6M
Deconstructing the network mechanisms of chronic pain and reward in the amygdalaR00DA043609 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CORDER, GREGORY · 2019 to 2021
$744k
NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA043609NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM140923NIMH NIH HHS T32-MH01465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pervasive use of opioid compounds for pain relief is rooted in their utility as one of the most effective therapeutic strategies for providing analgesia. While the detrimental side effects of these compounds have significantly contributed to the current opioid epidemic, opioids still provide millions of patients with reprieve from the relentless and agonizing experience of pain. The human experience of pain has long recognized the perceived unpleasantness entangled with a unique sensation that is immediate and identifiable from the first-person subjective vantage point as "painful." From this phenomenological perspective, how is it that opioids interfere with pain perception? Evidence from human lesion, neuroimaging, and preclinical functional neuroanatomy approaches is sculpting the view that opioids predominately alleviate the affective or inferential appraisal of nociceptive neural information. Thus, opioids weaken pain-associated unpleasantness rather than modulate perceived sensory qualities. Here, we discuss the historical theories of pain to demonstrate how modern neuroscience is revisiting these ideas to deconstruct the brain mechanisms driving the emergence of aversive pain perceptions. We further detail how targeting opioidergic signaling within affective or emotional brain circuits remains a strong avenue for developing targeted pharmacological and gene-therapy analgesic treatments that might reduce the dependence on current clinical opioid options.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidPainBrainHumansOpioid PeptidesSensationAnalgesics, OpioidOpioid Peptidesamygdalacingulate cortexemotionnucleus accumbensperiaqueductal grayvalenceμ opioid receptor

Identifiers

PMID33314372
PMCPMC8197770
OpenAlexW3111314999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.