Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33314269›Full record

SynthesisAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2021

Systematic review with meta-analysis: safety and tolerability of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-existing inflammatory bowel diseases.

Joseph Meserve, Antonio Facciorusso, Ariela K Holmer, Vito Annese, William J Sandborn, Siddharth Singh

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Inflammatory bowel disease and breast cancer: epidemiological evidence, shared biology, and clinical management.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph MeserveDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1228-3215
Antonio FacciorussoGastroenterology Unit, Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia, Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2107-2156
Ariela K HolmerDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Vito AnneseValiant Clinic & American Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
William J SandbornDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3314-7960
Siddharth SinghDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2640-7269
University of California San Diego · USOspedali Riuniti di Foggia · IT

Funding

San Diego Digestive Diseases Research CenterP30DK120515 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LARS ECKMANN · 2019 to 2026
$10.8M
Training Grant in GastroenterologyT32DK007202 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GHOSH, PRADIPTA · 1985 to 2022
$7.7M
Comparative Risks and Benefits of Pharmacological Therapies for Older Patients with Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesK23DK117058 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SINGH, SIDDHARTH · 2018 to 2022
$971k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK117058NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK117058NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK120515NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007202NIDDK NIH HHS T32DK007202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors may variably impact patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases.

aimsTo evaluate the risks and outcomes of adverse events in patients with pre-existing inflammatory bowel diseases treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

methodsThrough a systematic literature review up until July 31, 2020, we identified 12 studies reporting the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in 193 patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Outcomes of interest were relapse of inflammatory bowel disease, need for corticosteroids and/or biologics to manage inflammatory bowel disease relapse, and discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We calculated pooled rates (with 95% confidence intervals [CI]) using random effects meta-analysis, and examined risk factors associated with adverse outcomes through qualitative synthesis of individual studies.

resultsOn meta-analysis, 40% patients (95% CI, 26%-55%) experienced relapse of inflammatory bowel disease with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Among patients who experienced relapse, 76% (95% CI, 65%-85%) required corticosteroids, and 37% (95% CI, 22%-53%) required biologic therapy. Overall, 35% patients (95% CI, 17%-57%) with inflammatory bowel disease discontinued immune checkpoint inhibitors. Gastrointestinal perforation and abdominal surgery due to immune checkpoint inhibitor complications occurred in <5% patients. In a large study, inhibitors of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) were associated with a higher risk of relapse than programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors.

conclusionsApproximately 40% of patients with pre-existing inflammatory bowel diseases experience relapse with immune checkpoint inhibitors, with most relapsing patients requiring corticosteroids and one-third requiring biologics. CTLA-4 inhibitors may be associated with higher risk of relapse.

Indexed as

ColitisInflammatory Bowel DiseasesCTLA-4 AntigenHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsCTLA-4 AntigenImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33314269
PMCPMC8041067
OpenAlexW3111270650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.