ReviewInternational journal of implant dentistry2020
Effectiveness of the bone ring technique and simultaneous implant placement for vertical ridge augmentation: a systematic review.
Review in International journal of implant dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07619846 (Evaluation of Effectiveness of Bone Ring Technique in One Stage Surgery of External Maxillary Sinus Lifting With Implantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Effectiveness of Bone Ring Technique in One Stage Surgery of External Maxillary Sinus Lifting With Implantation: A Prospective Case Series
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tenting screw (tent pole) technique in vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge augmentations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2026Review
- Bone Ring Grafts Versus Non-Resorbable Membrane GBR for Vertical Ridge Augmentation: A Prospective Cohort Study.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2026Article
- Implantation awakens peri-implant osteogenic potential via Snx5-EGFR axis-mediated mechanical transduction.International journal of oral science · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of the Bone Regenerative Potential of a Novel Calcium Silicate-Modified Calcium Carbonate Graft Material: Histological and Micro-Computed Tomography Assessment Using a Rat Calvarial Defect Model.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Efficacy of bone ring grafts for the reconstruction of alveolar ridge deficiencies: a systematic review. Part II: animal trials.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Implants Placed with a Ring Technique Using Inlay and Onlay Block Xenografts in the Mandible of Rabbits.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Autogenous bone ring augmentation around single tooth implantation in the esthetic zone: A retrospective case series study with 2-3 years of follow-up.Journal of dental sciences · 2023Article
- Impact of simultaneous placement of implant and block bone graft substitute: an in vivo peri-implant defect model.Biomaterials research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDimensional changes after dental extraction frequently lead to situations in which bone augmentation procedures are required prior to dental implant placement. Bone ring technique (BRT) has been described as a one-stage approach to restore vertical alveolar ridge defects, in which an autogenous or allogeneic cortico-cancellous bone block graft is stabilized with a dental implant inserted simultaneously. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical performance of BRT. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search was conducted in four databases: (1) The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed) via Ovid; (2) Web of Science (WOS); (3) SCOPUS; and (4) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool were used to assess the quality of evidence in the studies reviewed.
resultsSixteen studies with a total of 186 patients treated with 219 bone rings bocks were included in the review. The studies showed a mean bone gain of 4.94 mm, mean bone resorption of 0.83 mm, and mean marginal bone loss of 0.57 mm after a mean follow-up period of 13.35 months. A mean bone ring survival rate of 97.26% and implant survival rate of 94.97% were recorded.
conclusionsBRT would appear to be an adequate alternative technique for restoring single vertical alveolar ridge defects with simultaneous dental implant placement. However, further studies comparing this technique with other vertical ridge augmentation procedures in different clinical scenarios are needed to confirm the present results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.